Friday, May 30, 2014

Revivals over the next few days







Hi all, Mike here running very late with a mini revival list. I'll be as brief as possible, so here we go:



BILLY LIAR for free- (subject to availability)- Fri May 30 at 4- MOMA- A dramedy from director John Schlesinger (Midnight Cowboy, Day of the Locust). Tom Courtenay plays a Walter Mitty- type, except his vivid daydreams don't shield him very well from job issues (like embezzlement), family issues, and 2 girlfriends. But then he meets his dream girl, played by Julie Christie. Will he choose her over his fantasy life? Sounds like an interesting film:



SORCERER- Sat May 31 at 7 for me, for the rest of you- Fri May 30 and Mon June 2- Thurs June 5 at 7 and 9:45- Film Forum- A 4k DCP restoration, of a film you may never have heard of, even if you were around for its 1977 release. I'm aiming for the Saturday May 31st screening at 7pm. If for some reason it doesn't work for me or especially for you, the other options are posted. Click on the Film Forum link below for the complete schedule of  Sorcerer's week long run for a day and time that might work better for you. 

From director William Friedkin, a remake of The French classic The Wages of Fear (though Friedkin would say otherwise), where desperate men, trapped in a shithole of a village in South America, find that the only way to get enough money to leave, is to drive old dynamite and fragile (and leaking?) nitroglycerin over 200 miles of brutal terrain and degrading bridges and roads. The film itself is split into three parts. First we see how each of the men put themselves in dire straits, like a New Jersey hood (Roy Scheider) running from the Mob after a screw-up, a French embezzler avoiding capture, an Arab terrorist avoiding capture in Jerusalem, an older Nazi still on the run. Next we see the fire in the oil refinery out of control, we see the miserable conditions in the village, and why the aforementioned men need to risk their lives to transport the literally easy-to-explode material across a South American jungle. And for the bulk of the film, we see the journey itself. The journey done on reinforced old trucks, in brutal weather, rickety roads, more than a few robbers, and growing tensions among the men themselves. Never mind the world's weakest rope and wood bridge known to man; featured in the film's centerpiece during a raging storm. No CGI in this scene for sure.

Now how did this tough film filled with anti-heroes do in the box office? Badly. Over budget and requiring two studios (Universal and Paramount) to complete and distribute it, the film with the misleading and inappropriate title arrived and promptly crashed. Critics of the day ripped it, with the notable exceptions of Roger Ebert, Newsweek's Jack Kroll, and the New York Times' Vincent Camby (his review was the more tepid of the three). The box office was brutally bad. Not Heaven's Gate bad, but bad enough. Running into Smokey and the Bandit and Star Wars, Sorcerer got pummeled. The movie business really seemed to change for good that summer, with more escapist fare dominating the box office, and risky serious films like Sorcerer (like Scorsese's New York New York which would come out later that summer)  were shown to be no longer commercially viable for studios. A simplistic view that's not entirely accurate, but that's the lesson that seems to have been drawn and remains the heart of the summer movie business today. 

Sorcerer was figuratively, and at times literally, replaced by Star Wars. Sorcerer was released as Star Wars began to expand. Due to contractual obligations, some theaters had to dump Star Wars to screen Sorcerer, and as the Friedkin film began to tank, most of those theaters couldn't wait to replace the film with something else. That something else was usually Star Wars. So Sorcerer began to disappear, with only the footnote of an Oscar nomination for Sound, which it of course lost to Star Wars. It wasn't pretty much gone completely until 1987, when it was finally released on VHS and Laser Disc. A DVD transfer (that Friedkin has trashed as a poor quality dupe) came out in 1998. And slowly a cult has formed over this film.Modern day reviewers and bloggers have championed the film, alongside Ebert, Quentin Tarantino and Stephen King.

So chances are you don't know this tense film, that has more shades of Treasure of the Sierra Madre than The Wages of Fear. Hell, it takes more elements from Georges Arnaud's original book than the French film Arnaud hated. Shot more as a silent film, where Friedkin pushed for as little dialogue as possible. A good lead performance by Schieder and an eerie, at times unsettling score from the band Tangerine Dream, this is the kind of film you take a chance on:

      

RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK- Wed June 4 at 7- AMC Empire and Regal Union Square- So what do I do after posting a film that I wrote was killed by summer escapist big-time fare like Star Wars. Post a summer escapist big-time film that would have also killed Sorcerer at the box office if it had a chance. I recognize the hypocrisy, and I can live with that quite easily.

I posted this film again and again, and I do  so again.  I've done Midnight screenings. I did it in Bryant Park, where the dialogue was hard to hear at times, but the music came in well, and as long you could see the screen, who cares? I did the restored IMAX screening, and boy did that kick major ass. So I post it again. The screen isn't IMAX, but this will be a DCP screening; I'm guess it's the digital restoration that's been kicking around for a couple of years now. And as for the film itself, if you don't know the first Indiana Jones film, then what the hell are you doing looking at this? In my personal top 35, on both AFI Top 100 lists, won multiple Oscars, and oh yeah, one of the most fun films ever made:



Let me know quickly if there's interest. Later all. 

Thursday, May 22, 2014

May revivals: Memorial Day weekend plus











Hey all, Mike here with a revival list for the rest of May, with emphasis on this coming Memorial Day weekend. Not a large list, but eclectic enough. Here we go, no time to waste. I'll start with two revivals that conflict with each other on Friday, May 23rd:



SHOOT THE PIANO PLAYER with Happy Anniversary for free (subject to availability)- Fri May 23 at 8- MOMA- Francois Truffaut's version of a gangster film, where thriller and comedy aspects are thrown into the genre in uneven amounts. A concert pianist, burned out and widowed, works in a dive. Has 2 hot chicks who want him, but he's closer to Spock then to an emotionally expressive person, except when he plays the piano. But now that his brothers are in trouble with (amateur) criminals, things can't stay good forever. Never seen this, but the mixture of comedy, drama, thriller aspects, homages to Warner Bros B crime flicks, and a passing resemblance to Vertigo (more than just passing?!?!?), it's sounds very interesting.

Preceded with the comedic short, Happy Anniversary. An Oscar winner for Best Live Action Short, from 1963. A woman prepares an anniversary dinner for herself and her husband. As her husband tries to buy a last minute gift, it seems all of Paris is against him getting home on time. Kinda similar to After Hours, but not nearly as dark:



THE MERCHANT OF FOUR SEASONS- Fri May 23 at 9- Walter Reade at Lincoln Center- From Lincoln Center's Rainer Werner Fassbinder retrospective. A DCP restoration that put Fassbinder on the map in West Germany. Following the story of a man back from the Foreign Legion. A little man in every way; far from loved by his upper-class mother, married to his physical opposite of a wife (Hanna Schygulla) who isn't his one love, forced to become a fruit peddler when he can't even go back to his former job as a policeman. Realistic, occasionally subtle depiction of depression, suffered by someone with self-destructive tendencies and little hope of seeing a light at the end of the tunnel. Probably something Fassbinder was familiar with, though this might supposition on my part, when considering his suicide about eleven years after Merchant was released. Definitely Fassbinder's first attempt to make something similar to a Douglas Sirk film. A tough film, but a good one. Yes, it's about small people, but don't say why I should pay attention, since some of you don't have  that issue with the likes of Far From Heaven, Death of a Salesman, or at least a healthy chunk of Fellini's work:



STAR TREK 4: THE VOYAGE HOME- Fri May 23- Sun May 25 at Midnight- IFC Center- Part of IFC Center's A rare screening of the most successful of all the Star Trek films starring the original television cast. The third part of an unofficial trilogy within the series, that started with The Wrath of Khan, released in time for Star Trek's 20th anniversary. Admiral Kirk and his crew go on their way back to Earth, to face charges of disobeying Starfleet orders. Those events took place during the previous film, The Search for Spock, but you'd need not see that film to appreciate this one. They spend maybe one minute tops to remind us what happened in the third film and then move on. Anyway, Kirk and the crew discover the Earth threatened with destruction from an alien force. But it appears the aliens are not trying to destroy the planet intentionally, but trying to communicate with the Earth species humpback whales, which are long extinct. The only way to save the Earth, according to Spock, is time travel to the late 20th Century, extract a couple of humpback whales and bring them back in hopes of communicating to the aliens. 

So off they go to 1986 San Francisco, and while there is humor prior, the story kicks into high gear once the crew lands in Golden Gate Park. Mixture of fish out of water and time travel comedy (lightly stressed). With the benefits of twenty or so years of character work and knowledge to enhance the humor, and little to no sci-fi elements to interfere (unless absolutely necessary). Yes, the Save the Whales message is delivered heavily, but that seems par for the course with Star Trek. Especially with the original series. Whether it was race relations, The Vietnam War, or the anti-war movement, the message is generally delivered heavily then, and it's delivered heavily again in The Voyage Home. Luckily the Save the Whales portion is the only heavy-handed aspect of the picture. Most of the humor is scripted in this throwback to the lighter episodes of the original series, but not all. Notably the scene where Russian Chekov goes around asking Americans during the tail end of the Cold War, where the nuclear vessels (or whessels) are.

Director Mr. Spock, eh, Leonard Nimoy keeps a light leash on the proceedings, getting the most relaxed performances from all the Trek regulars, while keeping the Trek and Humor elements not separate, but interchangeable and successful. A more successful light touch than in the highest grossing film of Nimoy's directorial career, Three Men and a Baby, which he got thanks to Star Trek 4. And yes, these relaxed performances includes William Shatner. He's still all the kind of Shatner you can imagine, but a more relaxed Shatner is here. Free of the heavy burdens of the three previous Trek films, Shatner is especially relaxed with Nimoy as Spock (especially once they're on 20th century Earth), and the main dinner scene with Seventh Heaven's Catherine Hicks.

4 Oscar nominations and the best screenplay of the original Trek series. Basically, a lot of fun. It may not have any of the major action scenes of the two Trek reboots, but a better film:
   


PURPLE RAIN- Fri May 23- Sun May 25 at 12:05AM- IFC Center- It plays again at Midnight-ish at IFC Center. A DCP restoration that plays all weekend long, including Sunday the 25th. For the rest, I'll repost what I wrote the last time I listed it:

"Pauline Kael once said in the late 60's that the time then was ripe to create more musicals with the present (then) rock stars like Janis Joplin. That's what made the musicals of the 30s, 40s and 50s successful: they were populated with the top recording artists of the day (Doris Day, Rosemary Clooney, Crosby et. al.). That's what the studios could do: setup a musical with one or many of today's contemporary recording artists."

I think that fits in the case of Once, where you had recording artists doing their songs. And it certainly applies to Prince with this film. Can't imagine a good actor from that period pulling off these kind of songs, no matter who wrote them. Not the greatest film ever made, and not what you call great acting by Prince. But with performances of songs like "When Doves Cry", "Let's Go Crazy" and the title track, the sleeper hit of the summer of 1984 literally rocks whenever the music comes up. Watch how Prince went from successful rock act to icon status. Granted, he would later throw it away with crap like "Under The Cherry Moon" and "Graffiti Bridge", change his name to a symbol with no real meaning, and basically become strange to the point of uninteresting. But watching and listening to him here, anything seemed possible back then. Prince did win an Oscar for music, in a category that no longer exists.



WHITY- Sat May 24 at 9- Walter Reade at Lincoln Center- From Lincoln Center's Rainer Werner Fassbinder retrospective. Possibly his most notorious film, one that I don't believe ever received a proper U.S. release Fassbinder's first melodrama. A Western shot on sets previously used by Sergio Leone for his films. Actually it veers closer to Django Unchained and 12 Years a Slave than any particular Spaghetti Western from the era. Set in 1878, Whity is the nickname of the adult slave butler,ok, indentured servant at this point of the story. The name given to him by the patriarch of a plantation who is also his father. The rest of the family berates Whity, and when they don't berate him, they beg Whity to kill the patriarch.  That also includes Whity's mother, a kitchen slave. The only people in Whity's life that might love him, and perhaps only in a Mandingo-like ideal, is the nearby saloon singer/ hooker with a possible heart of gold (Hanna Schygulla), and the youngest son of the patriarch (who may not know he's related to Whity?). 

And I haven't brought up the KKK and S & M aspects of the film. So as you can imagine, this is a tough film. One that makes Django Unchained snuggly soft in comparison, and at only a ninety something minute running time. And despite the almost golden halo way Fassbinder shoots actor Gunther Kaufmann (Rainer's boyfriend at the time), Fassbinder's script puts him through the ringer. But puts him through the wringer that's almost par for the course in a Fassbinder film. Almost pitiless for his main character. Empathetic and thorough in terms of how unfair it is for those with power puts and down and abuses someone. But if you don't rise above and fight back, too bad for you. Even if the final outcome for resistance is death, you must resist. And considering this is a Spaghetti Western and not Verionkia Voss (Fassbinder's variation of Sunset Blvd.), a gun will be drawn and there will be blood.

With all of that, it tanked big in West Germany. Rainer's first big budget film almost qualifies as a My Year of Flops entry. Despite the difficulty of making the film in Fassbinder's Beware of a Holy Whore (about the troubles with film making in general), it wasn't released in Europe for decades and has never received an official North American release. Even after Fassbinder's reputation grew, Whity went mostly unseen outside of Germany until about a decade ago. But the mixture of hot button pushing, Hollywood melodrama and Western motifs has given Whity growing respect for it in Europe, a cult following, and now a rare New York screening. Not the easiest film to do, but if you're up to the challenge, I am:     




LORD OF THE FLIES- Wed May 28 at 8- MOMA- the original Lord of the Flies. Peter Brook's adaptation of William Golding's book. Shot in black and white, but not necessarily black and white in tone. The idea of a kid doing whatever he wants is not unfamiliar to us. Millions ran to see the light version of this story in Home Alone. Consider this a much more bitter pill to swallow. Using amateur young actors, Brook successfully tells the story of a group of boys, marooned on an island with no adults. They split into 2 tribes, until baser instincts and survival of the fittest prevail. Ignore the 1990 remake, and go for this.


Let me know if there's interest. Later all and enjoy your Memorial Day weekend.

Wednesday, May 14, 2014

May Revivals: Second Third













Hey all. Mike here with a list of revivals in May. Not the rest of the month, just leading up to Memorial Day weekend without going over. But it's a somewhat long list, so I'll break it up into three parts: the Stanley Kubrick section (which is short), the Rainer Werner Fassbinder section (which is not short, though a few of the films are), and films not from Kubrick or Fassbinder (also short). In fact, I'll start with others:


 
LOGAN'S RUN for $8.00- Thurs May 15 at 7 and 9:30- Bow Tie Chelsea Cinemas- A cheap screening of the sci-fi film from 1976. Not what I would consider a classic among the greats by any stretch, yet too popular to be consider a cult classic as well. Kind of in-between. Your choice of screenings: the 7pm with a Hedda Lettuce intro, 9:30 without Hedda.

Set in the late 23rd Century, where people live in a futuristic city. A Utopian city where the beautiful young people can carry out and fulfill their non-violent desires, and a computer smarter than even Hal-9000 runs every other facet of their lives. This includes having every citizen on their 30th birthday, go through a ritual called Carrousel, where om the citizen's Last Day, they vaporize with the hopes of being Renewed. Some citizens see Carrousel as a way of maintaining population control through false ceremony and incineration, and decide to run and escape the city. Some of them are Running to a place called Sanctuary, where they would be safe. All of those who Run are chased by a kind of police called Sandmen, who either bring the Runners to Carrousel, or execute them on the spot. 

Were these Sandmen characters an uncredited (unconscious?) inspiration for Judge Dredd perhaps? Either way, this is the part of the story where Michael York's title character comes in. Logan is the best of the Sandmen, who enjoys his life and his job, but is puzzled about this Sanctuary. He's also fascinated by Jessica, who believes in Sanctuary. She's played by Jenny Agutter, who some of you may know now as an older woman in Call The Midwife and Captain America: The Winter Solider, but who is almost insanely beautiful here. Anyway, Logan is forced by the computer to investigate this Sanctuary, by changing his lifeclock (don't ask) and forcing him to become a Runner. He takes Jessica with him, but both are vulnerable from people seeking revenge on Logan, from the forces on the outskirts of the city and beyond, and from his fellow Sandmen. One in particular (played by Richard Jordan), Logan's best friend who is unaware of Logan's mission, and is taking this seeming betrayal VERY personally.

Honestly, I'm doing my best to make this sound great, but the film does become quite silly and/or over the top at times. The 70s vibe here is more kitschy at times (something Hedda will have fun with I'm sure), and most of the Oscar winning Visual Effects don't hold up. How much silliness you can take may depends on the individual, and that's before we get to the three quarter mark of the film, and Peter Ustinov's character gets involved. Luckily, the Oscar nominated Art Direction and Cinematography still hold up, and York and Agutter give the film enough earnestness, energy and enthusiasm to get us over some rough patches:   
 


THE WARRIORS- Fri May 16 and Sat May 17 at Midnight- IFC Center- A midnight screening of the cult film. The 1979 movie from director Walter Hill. An update of Xenophon’s Anabasis (the route duplicated in a passable manner on the late 70s MTA subway maps), finds our title group framed for killing a powerful gang leader. The Warriors spend the night going from the Bronx and through Manhattan, trying to get back to their home turf of Coney Island. With the cops and some bizarre looking gangs nipping at their heels. A few great performances, but a lot of huh? type of perfs as well. Some really good action scenes. On one of my trips to see this, one of our crew described the film as such: "Sometimes the film goes from good to great to crap! Sometimes all in the same scene. Sometimes in the same shot!".

Was the Grand Theft Auto of its day. The commercials had to be taken off the air at a certain time. Some people didn't like the depiction of New York as rotting to the core, with inefficient police. It would have been a bigger hit, if gang violence in New York and Boston, hadn't caused the film to be pulled out of theaters. Reviled by critics then, praised as fun junk now:




DR STRANGELOVE- Fri May 16 at 7:30 (maybe) and 9:45, Sat May 17 at 3, 5:15, 7:30 and 9:45, and Sun May 18 and Mon May 19 at 6:30 and 8:30- Film Forum- A new 35mm print. The classic film plays for a full week, but only Friday thru Monday is doable for me. The 7:30 on Friday the 16th is a maybe for me; I won't know for sure if I can do it until around 5:30- 6:15. Tuesday the 20th would have been doable, but the film's only screening is at 10pm, so forget that. Odd that the film isn't screening the 4k DCP restoration, that MOMA, IFC Center, and the Forum themselves have screened in the past, but hey, whatever.

Now as for Dr. Strangelove, if you ever bother to put your eyes on this list more than two or three times a year then you know what this film is, and you don't need me to describe this to you. Several of you have seen this in theaters with me before. Some of you have even seen it twice with me before. One of the few dark satires to get it exactly right. Just the everyday story of an insane general, who sends out his bomber unit to attack Russia. Considered one of the best anti-war films ever made. But for those who hate that term (seriously, are you that dumb to refuse to put this into historical context), then consider this an anti-rigidity and anti-stupidity film instead, OK? An excellent mixture of farce and action. And accurate enough in terms of military capability and military speak, that the Air Force demanded answers and questioned Stanley Kubrick.

If you've never seen it with an audience, make time for it. On as many AFI Top 100 lists that it could qualify for. One of the prime examples of Oscar screwing up, when it comes to not giving a film Best Picture. Strangelove is usually Exhibit A, while something like Goodfellas and Raging Bull would be considered Exhibits B and C, respectively. One of my top 5 favorite films ever, and my second favorite Kubrick film, after 2001. And as good a cast as this has, 3 top performances from Peter Sellers . . . , the range this man had is stunning. I dare any of you to find the seams where his performances don't work. Though some of you may prefer George C. Scott's performance; forced out of his comfort zone by Kubrick to get progressively more over-the-top, and is funny as hell:



SPARTACUS- Wed May 22 at 7- AMC Empire- A DCP screening. The Starz version has its cult following and is quite an underrated series. But this film version has its virtues. Starring Kirk Douglas, Laurence Olivier, Tony Curtis, Jean Simmons, Charles Laughton, Herbert Lom and Peter Ustinov. Kubrick replaced Anthony Mann at the beginning of production on this spectacular epic about a Roman slave revolt, based on Howard Fast's thinly veiled McCarthy-era allegory, and scripted by blacklisted writer Dalton Trumbo. Oscars for Ustinov, Art Direction, Costume Design and Cinematography (of which Kubrick actually did all the work, but the union man Russell Metty received the actual award!). A bit slow, even by Kubrick standards, but worth the time. This is the 3 hr restored version, which includes the scene where Olivier attempts to seduce  Curtis while they bathe together. Originally edited out due to pressure from the Production Code and the Legion of Decency, it was restored with Anthony Hopkins dubbing in Olivier's voice (he died a few years earlier):

https://www.amctheatres.com/movies/classic-series-spartacus


Next are films from Lincoln Center's Rainer Werner Fassbinder retrospective, entitled Fassbinder: Romantic Anarchist Part 1. A film buff who came out from Theatre, not Film School. A highly prolific writer/director as well as actor, editor, and cameraman, who jammed a number of stage and radio plays, TV movies and one notable limited series, and forty theatrical films over a thirteen-plus year career, until his death in 1982. He tackled a variety of topics head on; from labor, to race relations, to immigration, to terrorism, to life in Germany before, during, and/or after World War 2, to romance (between men and women, and between men and men). He had immense empathy for those on the margins of society, and distaste for those who abuse their power over others. He told these stories through various filters: through film noir, through science fiction, through the filter of a Douglas Sirk-like romantic drama (after a conversation Fassbinder had with Sirk himself), through an almost clinical fly-on-the-wall approach. Even a German style American Graffiti-like film about young people, though with hardly the same amount of good times on display. And as Fassbinder grew more confident with his abilities, he mixed and matched his approaches. Not science fiction; that he dabbled with only once, in World On A Wire for television, which unfortunately I won't be able to catch. And he did all of this with an unofficial stock company, of which the likes of Hanna Schygulla and Margarethe von Trotta are among the best known today. None of these were easy relationships, because he tended to do what he wanted to do with the audience: to provoke a reaction.

Now most of these mixes came later in Fassbinder's career, which will not be cover in this particular retrospective. We'll have to wait for those come Part 2 of Lincoln Center's retrospective come November. Here are some of his relatively earlier works, or the ones to first hit New York. Don't be surprised if most or all of these films are unknown to you. There hasn't been a retrospective of Fassbinder's work since MOMA's around 2007. There hasn't been anything new of Fassbinder in New York since 1983-84, and unlike Truffaut or Kurosawa, no one has been willing or adventurous enough to carve a similar career path or touch hot button topics with frequency like Rainer did. And unless you're a fan of the Criterion Collection, you're not going to try to find his work. I won't go into how much cocaine and alcohol probably fueled him, or made him a cautionary tale to perhaps a few, I'll stick with the films. Only a few of which I'll post here. Mainly because of time, and partly because there will be one or two more on the next list. I'll try to keep these posts as brief as possible.

Also note that if you want to see three of these films, Lincoln Center offers a deal. I believe it's either 3 for twenty dollars, or 3 for twenty-five. Not sure which, but they do have this offer, with the films listed here and through June 1. The main is below this list, followed by several films:    



THE MERCHANT OF FOUR SEASONS- Fri May 16 at 3 and 9:20, Sat May 17 at 2:30, Sun May 18 at 4:45 and Tues May 20 at 8:30- Walter Reade at Lincoln Center- A DCP restoration that put Fassbinder on the map in West Germany. Following the story of a man back from the Foreign Legion. A little man in every way; far from loved by his upper-class mother, married to his physical opposite of a wife (Hanna Schygulla) who isn't his one love, forced to become a fruit peddler when he can't even go back to his former job as a policeman. Realistic, occasionally subtle depiction of depression, suffered by someone with self-destructive tendencies and little hope of seeing a light at the end of the tunnel. Probably something Fassbinder was familiar with, though this might supposition on my part, when considering his suicide about eleven years after Merchant was released. Definitely Fassbinder's first attempt to make something similar to a Douglas Sirk film. A tough film, but a good one. Yes, it's about small people, but don't say why I should pay attention, since some of you don't have  that issue with the likes of Far From Heaven, Death of a Salesman, or at least a healthy chunk of Fellini's work:



LOVE IS COLDER THAN DEATH with The Bridegroom, The Comedienne and The Pimp - Fri May 16 at 7, Sat May 17 at 4:30- Walter Reade- Fassbinder's first film, one of four he shot with his group in 1969. An Avant -Garde-ish film noir that's not dissimilar to Band of Outsiders. A pimp/ small time crook named Franz (Fassbinder), refuses to join a criminal organization. He plans a robbery with his girlfriend/prostitute (Hanna Schygulla in her first, nuanced performance in a Fassbinder film), and another man sent by the organization to kill him. Small crimes keep the trio together, but it's the robbery where, like all film noir, things must fall apart. Not liked when first released, what with its long takes and lack of humor. It's long takes might have been a partial by-product of working in theatre, like recording a theatrical performance with few or no cutaways. But praised in later years, when taken in context with Fassbinder's other work.

Preceded by The Bridegroom, The Comedienne and The Pimp. A 1968 short made of three long vignettes; hookers applying their trade, a stage play in performance, and a husband with his wife and her pimp (played by Fassbinder). I have no idea if it's any good:    



GODS OF THE PLAGUE- Sat May 17 at 7- Walter Reade at Lincoln Center- A sequel to Love Is Colder Than Death. Also shot in 1969, but methinks we don't have to know the first film to get into this. Franz, played by a different actor (leaner than Fassbinder from the previous film), is out of prison and is ready to go uh, back to work. He's part of a trio again, this one more of a love triangle or quartet. He sleeps around with one part of the triangle, his old girlfriend played again by Hanna Schygulla, as well as with with other women, one notably played by Margarethe von Trotta. But Franz's passion are stirred more by the other part of the triangle, a man he met in prison. A black man who killed Franz's brother (for good reason?). So yeah, things are complicated. Another film noir, a little more structured, perhaps because of the Samuel Fuller, Meville and Bogart influences. Overall, one of Fassbinder's best films from this early period:



WHY DOES HERR R. RUN AMOK- Sat May 17 at 9- Walter Reade at Lincoln Center- The last of Fassbinder's four films shot in 1969, co-directed with Michael Fengler. The only one shot in color, and the only one with an outline of scenes and mostly improvised dialogue. We're used to that with the likes of Christopher Guest's films or Curb Your Enthusiasm, but not necessarily in dramas. A black comedy, or dramedy if you prefer, seeing a few days in the life of a middle class, married office drone, and the slow yet seemingly inevitable crash he will undergo. But what the title character does once he hits rock bottom . . . . .

Another film covering depression, but also one that covered what it might take for one to break down and enter a killing spree. Studies on killing sprees and familicides were not plentiful back in 1969, for all I know they may not have existed. Especially in West Germany, so a lot of what is done in this film is instinctual, and not far off. The film wasn't exactly praised in its day, but appears to have had an influence on the Dogme film movement. Basically, if you've seen a Lars von Triers film, or some of the artier work of Gus Van Sant, then you know what you're getting yourself into with Why Does Herr R. Run Amok: 



THE AMERICAN SOLDIER- Sun May 18 at 3 and 9- Walter Reade at Lincoln Center- Another Fassbinder film noir, a more self-assured turn than the previous films mentioned. A German hitman returns home from America, after fighting in Vietnam and doing some mob work in the states. He's hired by desperate policeman to dispatch a few men they've been unable to capture. The hitman is warm with his family, cool with the women he sleeps with, and ice cold to those he's paid to kill. This being a film-noir, naturally things go awry. Either The Merchant of Four Seasons or The American Solider is the best of the Fassbinder films listed here. I'll let you decide which is better:  




Let me know if there's interest, later all.

Monday, May 05, 2014

May revivals: first third







Hey all, Mike here with the latest revival list. For the month of May, I will split it up into three lists. This one here, one that will probably go from May 16th  until about May 22nd I think, and then one from Memorial Day weekend until about the end of the month. Something tells me that last May list will be a little overwhelming for me to post everything, but I'll do my best. In the meantime, on to this list, here we go:

 
 
BEN-HUR (1959)- Wed May 7 at 7- AMC Empire- A DCP screening as part of AMC's Classic Film series, currently emphasizing the sword and sandal epic era of the 1950s/early 1960s.The 11 time Oscar winner and one of the highest grossing films ever mad (don't look at the regular list; check the adjusted for inflation list and be surprised), Ben-Hur gets a special screening. Part of AMC's special screenings of films:epics edition (my words, not theirs). We'll probably be getting a DCP of the recent restoration from about two and a half years ago. We'll probably be getting a DCP of the recent restoration from about two and a half years ago. If their recent presentation of The Ten Commandments is any indication, it should look fine and sound fantastic.

I went a long time without seeing Ben-Hur. It played frequently on the 4:30 Movie here in NYC. But it was chopped into what, 4 or 5 parts maybe, and if I was ever going to watch a Heston film back then, it would be Planet of the Apes. Once cable came along in the household, I still wouldn't pay much attention to it. The only time would be sequences of the famous chariot scene in a documentary about Wyler, or spots on TCM where the chariot scene was used as an example of the virtues or widescreen, as opposed to fullscreen or pan-and-scan.

This changed in February 2006, when I saw it on the Ziegfeld's big screen. The story of Judah Ben-Hur, a Jewish prince betrayed and sold into slavery by his Roman best friend, is the kind of epic film others aspire/aspired to be. Heston's broad style of acting results in a career performance here, as he seeks revenge throughout the year. A drive for revenge that does more to separate him from his love and his leprosy-plagued family than slavery ever did. Coming to a head with the kind of chariot race/ action scene that Gladiator and all its CGI could dream about.

Melodrama and sentiment are abound here, but I'm not opposed to a little excess, especially when its done this well. And yet the scenes involving Jesus, especially the crucifixion, were done with such sensitivity . . . . My feelings regarding The Passion of the Christ changed from being in my top Ten of 2004 just missing the top Five, to just barely in my Top 10 with no need to ever see it again. That's how good a job of direction I thought Wyler did. You might disagree, but I'm guessing you've never seen Ben-Hur on the big screen and hey, I'm not offering an answer, just a response to what I saw.

A nomination for the Screenplay. 11 Oscars, including Picture, Heston for Actor, Wyler for Director, scene-stealing Hugh Griffith for Supporting Actor, and Score. A record for Oscars, tied by Titanic and Return of the King. On both AFI Top 100 lists. May or may not be in my own top 100, but if it isn't, it's very close: 
 
 
 
QUEEN MARGOT- Sat May 10 at 7:15- Film Forum- A DCP restoration. It plays for one week, from Friday May 9 thru Thurs May 15. But Saturday May 10 is my only possible day, and 7:15 is my only possible time. A full bodied, and at times full bloody, adaptation of Alexandre Dumas's novel. I'm just gonna quote part of the Forum's description of this and then I'll resume: 

" (1994) France, 1572, and during an uneasy break in the wars of religion, Jean-Hugues Anglade’s King Charles IX concludes a marriage of state between his sister, Isabelle Adjani’s Catholic Margot, and Daniel Auteuil’s Huguenot King Henry of Navarre, by ramming forward a reluctant Adjani’s head in lieu of a “Oui.” Peace now, huh? — but Virna Lisi’s skull-faced Queen Mother/Regent is already plotting the St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre (see Intolerance in Special Events), and that’s just the beginning of the head-snapping side switches, non-stop scheming, sometimes accidental poisoning, double beheadings, and frenzied couplings, including Adjani’s throbbingly romantic affair with Vincent Perez’s La Môle. The late Patrice Chéreau’s high octane adaptation of the Dumas novel begins in fifth gear and never lets up, plunging in hip deep in history and into a dizzying array of characters, with passionate performances and a riveting, horrific staging of the Massacre. . . .:

It's a better description of the history than I could give. But if you want a historical drama with more of a kick, Queen Margot will provide it. If you're familiar with the recent series The Borgias and The Tudors, then you have an idea of what you're getting. Only this time with the kind of budget and hand-craftsmanship that cranks up the opulence to eleven. Plus your fair share of bodice-ripping, peasant massacring, monarch poisoning, and sword fighting, even a little dark comedy. Plus a strong amount of easy on the romance from leads Perez and Adjani. Actually I should re-phrase regarding Ms. Adjani. I'd seen her performances in a number of films over the years though no new film since the terrible Diabolique. But after seeing her last month in The Story of Adele H., I'm convinced there's little Ms. Adjani can't do on the big screen.

Was a big hit overseas and won some awards, including two wins and a Palme d'Or nomination at the Cannes Film Festival. But the original 161-162 minute version was not what we got here in the States. It was distributed by Miramax Films where the Weinstein brothers, or at Harvey Weinstein I believe, insisted on a shorter version with a bit more emphasis on the romance between Adjani and Perez. So almost twenty minutes were cut out by director Chereau, with a scene cut from the original edit between Perez and Adjani, the two of them outside wearing nothing but a single red cloak. The film did decent in the U.S. and received an Oscar nomination for costume design.

But we never saw the complete uncut version, as the Forum is touting it, and I'm not convinced we will now. Not with the Forum's website saying this 159 minutes as opposed to the 161-162 figure that played in Cannes twenty years ago, plus the Forum's use of the red cloak scene on its website. But if you think that will stop me from catching the film, you 're wrong: 
 
 
 
LOGAN'S RUN for $8.00- Thurs May 15 at 7 and 9:30- Bow Tie Chelsea Cinemas- A cheap screening of the sci-fi film from 1976. Not what I would consider a classic among the greats by any stretch, yet too popular to be consider a cult classic as well. Kind of in-between. Your choice of screenings: the 7pm with a Hedda Lettuce intro, 9:30 without Hedda.

Set in the late 23rd Century, where people live in a futuristic city. A Utopian city where the beautiful young people can carry out and fulfill their non-violent desires, and a computer smarter than even Hal-9000 runs every other facet of their lives. This includes having every citizen on their 30th birthday, go through a ritual called Carrousel, where om the citizen's Last Day, they vaporize with the hopes of being Renewed. Some citizens see Carrousel as a way of maintaining population control through false ceremony and incineration, and decide to run and escape the city. Some of them are Running to a place called Sanctuary, where they would be safe. All of those who Run are chased by a kind of police called Sandmen, who either bring the Runners to Carrousel, or execute them on the spot. 

Were these Sandmen characters an uncredited (unconscious?) inspiration for Judge Dredd perhaps? Either way, this is the part of the story where Michael York's title character comes in. Logan is the best of the Sandmen, who enjoys his life and his job, but is puzzled about this Sanctuary. He's also fascinated by Jessica, who believes in Sanctuary. She's played by Jenny Agutter, who some of you may know now as an older woman in Call The Midwife and Captain America: The Winter Solider, but who is almost insanely beautiful here. Anyway, Logan is forced by the computer to investigate this Sanctuary, by changing his lifeclock (don't ask) and forcing him to become a Runner. He takes Jessica with him, but both are vulnerable from people seeking revenge on Logan, from the forces on the outskirts of the city and beyond, and from his fellow Sandmen. One in particular (played by Richard Jordan), Logan's best friend who is unaware of Logan's mission, and is taking this seeming betrayal VERY personally.

Honestly, I'm doing my best to make this sound great, but the film does become quite silly and/or over the top at times. The 70s vibe here is more kitschy at times (something Hedda will have fun with I'm sure), and most of the Oscar winning Visual Effects don't hold up. How much silliness you can take may depends on the individual, and that's before we get to the three quarter mark of the film, and Peter Ustinov's character gets involved. Luckily, the Oscar nominated Art Direction and Cinematography still hold up, and York and Agutter give the film enough earnestness, energy and enthusiasm to get us over some rough patches:   
 
 



Let me know if there's interest, later all.