Friday, September 07, 2012

September revivals: first half







Hey, Mike here with a revival list for the first half of September. Since the U.S. Open is still going on, that's were my attention is focused. But here's a list anyway. Not as long as it could have been, and not with lengthy descriptions either. But films I want to see nevertheless. Here we go:


RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK in IMAX- Fri Sept 7 thru Thurs Sept 13- AMC Empire, AMC Lowes 34th st and AMC Kips Bay (E. 32nd st)- 1, 4, 7 and 10pm at Empire and 34th st, 2, 5, 8 and 10:40 at Kips Bay- I brought this up on the last list, so I won't repeat what I wrote before. I did catch it in Bryant Park last month and I was glad I went, despite the nearly insane mass of humanity that made it initially difficult to see. Their print was respectable. But the chance to see a digital restoration in 5.1 Dolby stereo is too good to pass up. Yes, it sounds like the digital restoration that has played at Midnight at IFC Center off and on since last December. But this will be blown up to cover IMAX screens without distortion (supposedly). Granted it's fake IMAX; screens smaller than the one at the AMC Lincoln Square screen. Therefore Raiders will only play on 3 screens in Manhattan, the ones I've posted, and nowhere else in the city, or Long Island for that matter.

For the record, I'll be going to the 8pm screening at the largest of the fake IMAX screens, at Kips Bay on 32nd and 2nd. For the rest of you, the other times there and at AMC Empire and AMC Lowes 34th st are listed here. And no, I will not post the Indiana Jones marathon on Saturday Sept 15 at those 3 IMAX screens. No need for me to catch Temple of Doom or Crystal Screen on IMAX. The need for Raiders, yes. But those two, no way (sorry Last Crusade):


CITIZEN KANE- Sun Sept 10- Tues Sept 11 at 7 and 9:20 (Sunday tentative for me)- Film Forum- A new digital restoration of one of the greatest films ever made. Ok people, show of hands, how many of you have ever heard of Citizen Kane? Ok, good. If you even bother to look at this list at all, you at least know of Orson Welles' film. Didn't expect to see any hands from those under 18 anyway. Now, how many of you know more about Kane than just Rosebud, even if it's aided by memories of HBO's passable version of the making of Kane, RKO 281? Similar number of hands, fine.

Now, how many of you have actually seen Citizen Kane from beginning to end? Ok, the number of hands have dropped, but I'll let you decide if that would be a fairly low number. I mean, some of have seen it through the very occasional airings on TCM. Maybe 1 or 2 of have seen it/ own it on DVD. New York/ New Jersey people as recent as the early 80s saw this on one of Channel 9's Million Dollar Movie airings. Or maybe 1 or 2 of you saw it in a film class or some sort. Now, how many of you have actually seen this on the big screen? Yeah, that's what I thought. The 1 or 2 of you who saw this with me at the Forum, when Kane ran for a week back in March 2004. Then I saw it again in April 2010, and I can add one more to make it three in total. I'm determined to increase this number, and I think this digital restoration will help.

Seeing this on the big screen as opposed to watching it on TV no matter what size screen you own, to use an old Larry Miller joke I'm found of using for different subjects, is the difference between shooting a bullet and throwing it. In terms of storytelling, pacing and emotional depth (as well as innovative in its use of visual effects, make-up and music), as modern a film as what we have now in release, and a lot better than all but a hand full (I'm trying to be nice and not be considered a snob. I probably failed at that a long time ago).

A flop in its day (when you do a thinly veiled attack on William Randolph Hearst, and he still wields considerable influence, it's amazing no one burned the negatives behind RKO's backs), a classic today. First in France, where it was screened shortly after WW 2 and had the praise and backing of filmmakers like Goddard. Then in the mid to late 50s, when it aired on TV and had a major re-release. 9 Oscar nominations, including Picture, Welles for Actor and Director, Bernard Herrmann for his Score, and Editing for Robert Wise. An Oscar to Welles and Joseph J. Mankiewicz for the Screenplay. Number one on both AFI Top 100 lists, and along with Casablanca and The Godfather, always in the conversation for greatest American films ever made. But basically, Welles took the skills he developed in theatre and radio, and (with a major assist from Mankiewicz's writing) changed film forever, without losing any theatrical flair or showmanship. See one of my top six favorite films of all time:



VERTIGO- Wed Sept 12, Sun Sept 16 and Tues Sept 18 at 7 and 9:30- Film Forum- A new digital restoration of the Hitchcock classic. A last minute addition to the Forum's schedule, and a welcome one. One of the best love stories eve made: love in terms of Obsessive and Unrequited. Interesting how the appreciation of the film has grown. From box office disappointment and even getting laughed at in some critical circles upon it's release (2 minor Oscar nominations), to disappearing by 1970, to its 1984 re-release where it attained instant Classic status and art house success, to the years before and after both AFI Top 100 lists came out where it more people discovered and appreciated it, to the point where it's even been considered among the best 2 or 3 films of all time thanks to more recent film lists. While I won't go quite that high (hello, didn't you pay attention to what I wrote with Citizen Kane?), certainly in my top 100, and fairly high at that.

Now note that I haven't written much about the story itself. To paraphrase Martin Scorsese when he wrote about Vertigo, not only is Vertigo required viewing, it also requires a Personal Response. Your life experiences will determine how you will take it. I'm guessing anyone who looks at my lists as seen Vertigo before. Therefore, you jumped past following the plot and can get to the heart (figuratively and literally) of the story. Seeing it on the big screen will probably change it further, so see it:  



FOLLOWING- Sat Sept 15 at 1:30- Walter Reade at Lincoln Center- Part of Lincoln Center's Christopher Nolan retrospective. Yeah, it seems a little early to have one. I don't plan to see most of these films, since I caught most of them already. With one notable exception: Following. A restored 35mm print of his first feature film from 1998, released here in the States in 1999. Set in London, a young unemployed writer decides to follow complete strangers for material. One of those strangers is a cat burglar, who ends up making him a sort of protegee. Why not, since the burglar is equally interested in following strangers, the ones he steals from that is. But none of this can come to any good, and does the young writer truly think he's in control of the situation? Never saw it, never heard of it back in the day. But really curious to try this suspense thriller out, especially to get an idea how Nolan has grown, and how much has been there in terms of talent from the start. And it's only 69 minutes long, so you'll be done with it quickly: 



MEMENTO- Mon Sept 17 at 6- Walter Reade at Lincoln Center- Part of the Christopher Nolan retrospective. The 2001 arthouse hit, that made Nolan a writer/director to be reckoned with ever since. A film that forces you to pay attention or be left far behind, Guy Pierce plays an amnesiac seeking revenge against the killer of his wife. But this isn't any old amnesia; he can remember everything up to the accident/murder (except the murderer himself), but he literally can't remember any memory less than 5 minutes old. He writes clues down, takes multiple Polaroids, and even has tattoos to help with the biggest clues, but how reliable are they? With Carrie-Ann Moss as a woman who might be able to him, and Joe Pantoliano as a man who never seems to be who he is.

Before Memento, there was Rashomon, with it's story about how memory or truth can never be fully known. Memento pushed that further, with a narrator who may not be reliable and whose story is being told backwards, while another story is told forward, with flashbacks as well. But with an intriguing memory at the heart, some good action and even humor reminiscent of say Inception, this was a major eye-opener back in 2001. One of the best films of that year, with Oscar nominations for Nolan and his brother for Screenplay Adaptation and for Editing:      



Let me know if there's interest. Later all.

Wednesday, August 15, 2012

August revivals: second half









Hey all. Mike here with a small list of revival screenings for August. More about my experience with the director and other leading man from The Room when I get the chance. Now on with this small, select choice of revivals, here we go:



THE LAST WALTZ- Fri Aug 17 at 12:05AM- IFC Center- A special Midnight screening of The Last Waltz, in honor of the recently deceased Levon Helm. Arguably the best concert film ever made. After Taxi Driver, a change of pace for director Martin Scorsese, filming the farewell concert of The Band on Thanksgiving 1976. Mixed with recording sessions that also included working with Emmylou Harris and The Staples. They also had some friends performing with them, including Van Morrison, Bob Dylan, Eric Clapton, Joni Mitchell, Ron Wood, Dr. John, and Ringo Starr. Also includes interviews with members of the Band, days after the concert. Also noteworthy is the cinematography of Michael Chapman, who also did Scorsese's Taxi Driver and Raging Bull. The first concert film to be photographed in 35mm: 



RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK for free at Bryant Park- Mon Aug 20 at sunset- The last of the Bryant Park films, and the most fun sendoff to the series that you could imagine. If you don't know the first Indiana Jones film, then what the hell are you doing looking at this? In my personal top 35, on both AFI Top 100 lists, won multiple Oscars, and oh yeah, one of the most best  films ever made. Now yes, there was the recent announcement of this film getting a week-long on a few IMAX screens in September. Now in terms of New York State and New Jersey, it will be 3 screens in Manhattan, 1 in Clifton New Jersey, 1 in New Rochelle, AND THAT'S IT. But if you can't wait that long, or you think you'll have difficulty doing any of those screenings, Monday at Bryant Park will do ok:



BLUE VELVET with an episode of Spider-Man and an episode of The Muppet Show- Sat Aug 25 at 6 (Velvet)- Muppet Show and Spider-Man played throughout the afternoon- Museum of the Moving Image in Astoria- Part of the Museum's See It Big retrospective. In my top 5 ever, possibly higher. I saw Blue Velvet when it was released back in 1986. Ok, 1987, thanks to critical acclaim. I was WAY too young to get all of what was going on, but what I did get was disturbing, fascinating, and told me that movies could be very different from Star Wars or The Wizard of Oz, or Casablanca. Now yes, the journey depicted here is somewhat similar to Dorothy's journey through Oz (intentional). But this precursor to Twin Peaks is it's own world. The shock factor may not be nearly the same for you compared to what 1986/87 audiences endured, but the story, the performances and Angelo Baldalamenti's beautiful score has endured.

What Shadow of a Doubt pushed in terms of evil in a small town Americana, Blue Velvet cranked to 11 and turned it on its (severed) ear. A very 50s town, with a very 50s kinda young man (Kyle MacLachlan) dealing with the kind of dark crisis a 50s era hero isn't obviously equipped to handle. Not without help, love and support that is. But oh what a dark journey to get to that point . . . This mystery/neo-noir/romantic drama got Lynch a Best Director nomination, and brought both his and MacLachlan's career back from the dead. Isabella Rossellini established herself as an actress once and for all, and Dennis Hopper became a working character actor forever, in a career performance. Also drew major controversy in its day for its, let's just say, sexual connotations, and what was required of Rossellini in her role. I believe it was Ebert who called this film the most vile thing he had ever seen (or something along those lines) and Rosselini attacked him (verbally) in response. A bit of a Rorschach test, this hauntingly beautiful film is. Decide for yourself.

But before Blue Velvet you can, as part of your admission, catch 2 TV episodes in any order you choose, playing from when the Museum opens until closing. One retrospective of Muppet Show episodes, and a retrospective of various Spider-Man animated series from the 60s to this year, in honor of the release of The Amazing Spider Man. The Muppet Show episode screening on the 25th is a 5th season episode with guest Victor Borge. In this episode, Fozzie suffers from a lack of confidence, Borge plays a piano duet with Rowlf, and (tries) to play Tchaikovsky with a group of baby Muppets. For the Spider-Man retrospective, you have a Season 1 episode from the original 1967 show. You know, the one with the classic theme song "Spider-Man, Spider-Man, does whatever a Spider can . . . " Now unfortunately this episode, "The Night of the Villains/ Here Comes Trubble", features no one from Spidey's rogues gallery. But the Season 1 episodes tend to be fun. I probably haven't seen this episode since it ran as a re-run on WNEW Channel 5, but I probably had fun then, will probably have fun now, and if you like Spidey, so will you:   








Let me know if there's interest. The next list by the way, will probably be even smaller. One, because my favorite New York City event, the U.S. Open, starts unofficially on Tuesday, August 21st, and begins officially on Monday, August 27th. The majority of my attention will be focused there. And two, I have no interest in Finding Nemo in 3-D on Friday, September 14th. Good film, but unlike The Lion King or Beauty and the Beast, I'll skip this 3-D re-release and wait for Monster's Inc. instead. Later all, and enjoy the rest of your summer.

P.S.: I've been waiting a while to post Billy Perkins' painting of Blue Velvet. Glad I had the chance now.

Wednesday, August 01, 2012

August revivals: first half












Hey all. Mike here with a list of revivals for the first half of August. A list put together with an eye not only toward films that really interest me, but also, for the most part, an eye toward the wallet. This will be the last long list for a little while. With the U.S. Open coming up, the next list or two (3?) will be on the small side. But enough of that, on with this list. Here we go:



THE ROOM with Tommy Wiseau and Greg Sestro in person- Landmark Sunshine Cinema- Sat Aug 4 at Midnight and Sun Aug 5 at 10PM (Friday August 3 is Sold Out)-  I've done this before, and enough time has passed that I'm ready to attempt this again. One of the best bad films of recent times, Tommy Wiseau's The Room continues playing at Landmark Sunshine Cinema at Midnight. This "Citizen Kane of bad movies" has to be seen to be believed. You can expect a Rocky Horror-esque experience, with lines quoted, talking back to the screen, flinging of spoons and tiny footballs. The only thing you may want to decide before seeing this, is whether or not you want to know the film before you attend a screening. Basically, do want to know what's coming and possibly be part of the audience participation aspect, or do you want to go in fairly cold?

As for The Room itself, the best I can say is, there is nothing quite like it. That's the best you're getting out of me. What? I didn't go into what it's about? Does it truly matter? Won't make it any better. Decide fast if you want to, because tickets will go fast. Several big differences from the usual thing done at Landmark Sunshine. First, instead of just on a Saturday, it will play all 3 days of this coming weekend, but Friday is already sold out. Second, there will a 10PM screening on Sunday as opposed to Midnight. And third, Wiseau himself will introduce the screening. What will he say? Who knows. Will anything he says have anything to do with The Room? Possibly. At previous screenings, he stayed afterwards for pictures, autographs, and answered questions. Or at least, provided responses. So who knows what this will be like. Also introducing the film with Wiseau is the film's other male lead, Greg Sestro:



CHARADE and PILLOW TALK- Sun Aug 5 at 7:10 (Charade) and 9:20 (Pillow)- Part of the Forum's 100th anniversary of Universal Studios retrospective. 2 of Universal's more successful romantic comedies, even though the first is heavier than the second. Both are also the best examples of romantic comedies from the late 1950s/ early 1960s.

First, Charade from 1963. Audrey Hepburn comes back to Paris with a murdered husband, an empty apartment and a gang of creepy men (including cowboy James Coburn and menacing George Kennedy with a big hook) who are threatening to kill her if she doesn't come up with the money her late husband stole from them. She doesn't know about any of this, and the only person who seems willing to help is Cary Grant; charismatic, flirty, tough enough to stand up to these bullies, but also not telling the truth about himself. Then you throw in Walter Matthau's character . . . . If you don't know the rest of the film, I won't spoil it for you.

Expert handling of the reins from director Stanley Donen. When to play up the romance, when to have a little knowing laugh with the audience, and when the ratchet up the tension and make the threats believable. Maybe not in retrospect, but certainly within the moment.  With a great opening credits sequence from Saul Bass and a Henry Mancini score to match. 
Next, Pillow Talk, the first of the Rock Hudson- Doris Day comedies, as well as both the most successful and the best. No point in breaking down plot, they're all about the same. Man and woman hate each other, love each other but don't know it, then eventually find out and after much arguing, a happy ending, with Tony Randall on the sidelines, making jokes. Like I said, the best of the bunch. I guess the biggest differences are the confusion in the plotline occuring because of Rock and Doris are forced to share a "party line" (talk about anachronism)  and that Rock pretends he's gay. Oooooooo-kay then. Oscar nominations include Day for Actress, Art Direction, Score and for Thelma Ritter for Supporting Actress in another wisecracking role. An Oscar for the Screenplay: 


THE ADVENTURES OF ROBIN HOOD- Mon Aug 6 at sunset- for free at Bryant Park- A free screening of the Errol Flynn classic. Might be a little hard to sit through the dialogue scenes if you're not close to a speaker. But the action should be real cool with a crowd. Dashing Robin Hood (Flynn) steals from the oppressive rich, gives to the poor, thumbs his nose at authority he doesn't respect (especially Claude Rains' Prince John), and tries to get jiggy with, I mean, MAKE TIME with Maid Marian (Olivia de Havilland - sigh . . .). Oscar nominee for Best Picture, it won for Art Direction, Editing, and Original Score. The most difficult of the Technicolor films to make work up to that point, and the most successful for its time. And, most importantly, fun for all ages.

The highlight for me is the sword fight between Flynn and Basil Rathbone. 2 swordsmen at their best, just like in Captain Blood. Like I said before to others, I have never seen better on-screen duelists then Flynn-Rathbone, unless the characters are named either Darth Vader and Luke Skywalker. Yeah I said it, deal with it:


TOPSY-TURVY- Tues Aug 7 at 6- Walter Reade at Lincoln Center- Part of the Walter Reade's series of films that stood out in the 50 year history of the New York Film Festival. A minor art house hit in the U.S. back in 1999. Not necessarily the best film of Mike Leigh's career, but one of his best for sure, as well as one of the best films of 1999. I also feel this is his most accessible for people unfamiliar with his work, despite the 2 hr, 40 minute length. Depicting the process that Gilbert and Sullivan went through in the creation of and producing the first production of The Mikado. Coming off a flop, yet still popular together to keep them from seeking individual success, despite their wish to separate professionally. I guess any confusion between Gilbert and Sullivan and say, the Beatles or the Stones might be intentional, but I digress. So not only does this film show life in the company, from the project's creation to its re-writing with egos on and off stage in full bloom, but it uses life in the company and the creation of The Mikado to give the audience an idea of life in Victorian-era London. Whether it's through an actor's morphine addiction, what a mistress will do seek an abortion, the ability of a husband and wife to hide behind Victorian mores to NOT express love to each other, to how it was to perform in the only theater that has electricity, you get a full idea of life in mid 1880s England.

I don't know how many actors going into the project, were trained to perform something like The Mikado. Based on the way Leigh creates his films, first through improvising scenes without knowing the entire screen story then rehearsing scenes written from said improvs, few if any cast members may have known what exactly they were to do. But by the end, you have a flesh out world, vivid people and a good idea of the first production looked and sounded like. Filled with cast members either better known for Leigh's other films, like Naked's Katrin Cartlidge and Another Day's Lesley Manville (as Gilbert's wife, depressed over both her childless state and unhappy marriage), and with cat members known for other projects, like Jim Broadbent (as Sullivan), Timothy Spall (Harry Potter, The King's Speech), Shirley Henderson (Bridget Jones, Meek's Cutoff) and Andy Serkis (Lord of the Rings, Rise of the Planet of the Apes). Oscar nomination for Leigh for Original Screenplay and Art Direction, Oscars for Makeup and Costume Design:



CUTTER'S WAY- Wed Aug 8 at 7:30- 92nd Y Tribeca- Part of the 92nd Y Tribeca's Jeff Bridges retrospective, and the first, possibly only film from it that I'll post. Partly because of scheduling on my end, and partly because of other films in other theaters. And partly, let someone else push The Big Lebowski. I'll push a film you probably don't know through no fault of your own, but because of the studio and audiences of the early 1980s.

Cutter's Way, also known as Cutter and Bone. A forgotten film from 1981. One of the last of the 70s style character study films made by United Artists, before Heaven's Gate's failure had the company sold to MGM. Kind of similar to Bridges' later film The Big Lebowski, but not played for laughs. A character study of two friends who are Vietnam vets, back in a day before Magnum P.I. became a megahit, and before the release of First Blood; when a Vietnam vet was usually depicted either as a deranged killer, or a damaged avenger. Bridges plays the cynical part time gigolo who tries to care for his depressed junkie wife, but beyond sex and drugs, can't give her any real intimacy. But he's stable next to John Heard's Bone, in one of the better performances you've probably never seen. This one armed, one eyed drunk with a bad leg, can rail against anybody and anyone, but then plays the cripple card when someone has enough of his shit. So this very un-PC character represents at times, the film's post-Watergate anger and distrust of authority. You can also consider him a predecessor to TV's Gregory House. The film twists into a modern noir, when Bridges' Cutter sees a young girl murdered, the murder is connected to someone powerful, and Heard's Bone finds a way to let's say, channel his aggression.

United Artists decided to change it's distribution pattern; after the film received good reviews and something of an audience, UA pulled it from release, and re-released only in art house theaters. Unheard of then and now. It helped the film make a profit, but over time, it buried the film, making its recent DVD release almost like opening a time capsule. Of the people who look at, or might consider looking at this list, only 1-3 of you might have even heard of this film, never mind have seen it. For the rest of you, it's time to rediscover it: 



POSTCARDS FROM THE EDGE for 7.50- Thurs Aug 9 at 7 and 9:30- Chelsea Clearview Cinema- A cheap screening of Mike Nichols' film based on Carrie Fisher's semi-autobiographical book, which Fisher adapted for the screen. Your choice of either the 7pm screening (with a Hedda Lettuce intro) or the 9:30 screening (no intro). This was part of the late 80s/early 90s effort (intentional?) of Streep to show she could be more than just a Serious Actress who does more than just Depressing Films. From 1990, we start off quickly following follow Carrie Fisher-stand in Streep go from drugged out unprofessional behavior on the set of her movie, to emergency room visit due to accidental overdose, to rehab.  Once she's out of rehab, the struggles have only just become. The struggle to work on set without drugs. The struggle to prove herself to a crew that expects her to screw up royally. The struggle with doing a crappy film, since her previous on-set behavior made her semi-toxic in Hollywood. The continuing struggle to find romance with men only interested in the on-screen persona, never mind navigating romantic minefields without alcohol. But her biggest struggle continues to be with her domineering mother (Shirley MacLaine); a living Hollywood legend, and knows it. A star whose her glory days are gone, but is fine with just dominating (benevolently) every room she's in. Thus, a loving yet toxic relationship between mother and daughter that must change if both are to grow.

The film doesn't feel nearly as dark as Fisher's book, but the right combo of smart script, great cast and good director makes this serio-comic film go down easier without ringing false. Talented mix of actors: from 1990 theater vets (including Dana Ivey, Simon Callow and a young Annette Benning), to character actors (including Oliver Platt, Anthony Heald and Mary Wickes), to 1990 A-listers  (lovably sleazy Dennis Quaid, a great Gene Hackman, and a good extended cameo from Richard Dreyfuss). But Streep is our glorious focus point, in her most underrated performance to receive a Best Actress Oscar nomination. She can play drugged with going over the top, maintains a vulnerability while growing incremental (and believably) stronger as the film progresses. And she stands toe to toe with MacLaine in a believable back and forth of mutual anger, frustration and love for each other. Hell, Streep even sings and sings well. Decades before Mama Mia!, Streep was having a good old time, belting out a song which would also receive an Oscar nomination.

Postcards did respectable business in the fall of 1990, though critically it was overshadowed by the classic Goodfellas. Hell, more people or about the same number of people, paid to see Ghost and that was already a summer hit. The film didn't receive an Oscar bump, and after it's home video/cable run, it's seems too have slowly gone away. Chances are, if you didn't see this at any point in the 1990s and/or are under the age of 30, you haven't seen Postcards from the Edge. Heard of the film, or at least the book, but haven't seen it. Here's a cheap way to change that:   



TOTAL RECALL (1990)-  Fri Aug 10- Wed Aug 15 at 1, 3:10, 5:20, 7:30, and 9:40- Film Forum- Coinciding with the release of the Colin Farrell remake, the Paul Verhoeven film gets a special one week run at the Forum. I 'm not sure when exactly I can do it as of this writing, so I'll just post all the times and move on. We're getting a digital restoration as opposed to a new print. Now call me pleasantly stunned that we're getting this film for a week as opposed to say, just Midnight screenings. If you told me that Total Recall would a Forum run like this at any point from say, 2000-2011, I would think hell no. I just hope we don't see crap like Cliffhanger or Robocop 2 get the same treatment. Or even other Schwarzenegger films unless it's Terminator 2. Ok, we can do Conan The Barbarian, but only if we're mocking it. Sorry, I've digressed . . .

One of the better action summer blockbuster flicks, and one of the best films of 1990. I'd argue with anyone about the former statement, and as for the later; let's just say there were quite a good number of quality films released that year, but filling the last 2 or 3 slots for a top 10 list is not that easy. You try it, and don't you dare put stuff like Home Alone or Kindergarten Cop there. Not that we should think of this as flaw-free, mind you. But Verhoeven rarely stints on excess. If there's a chance to make something emotionally or visually over the top, good ol' Paul never seems to miss out on the opportunities.

Here, in the biggest commercial hit ever made out of one of Phillip K. Dick's stories, set in 2084, a mild-mannered man wants to take a quick vacation, by having an adventure downloaded into his brain. But it causes a problem, when it appears he's actually some form of secret agent, the secret agent has info and said secret agent's personality and memories are, let's say, on hold. Then you have all these men coming out of the woodwork trying to kill him. So it's similar to those innocent man-on-the-run kind of flicks, like Hitchcock's The 39 Steps or North By Northwest. But then you add Arnold Schwarzenegger, character actor types like the ever reliable Michael Ironside, gun battles all over, Sharon Stone (two years before Verhoeven's Basic Instinct) sweating in barely there clothes, and this is before the trip to Mars and the appearance of mutants. The action scenes are good, and the mix of dark humor, cheesy humor, high quality visual effects and editing, make this version of Total Recall different from a lot more recent summer blockbusters, fun.

Oscar nominations for the sound, a special achievement Oscar for the visual effects. Meaning there wasn't enough votes to consider any other 1990 film than this. Considering Terminator 2 was only about 13 months later, we can think of Total Recall as the last of model/matte painting/makeup kind of big budget film, as opposed to the CGI blockbusters after that. Not that I'm trying to hate CGI heavy flicks like say, Lord of the Rings, Watchmen or Avatar, but there's a difference.

Oh yeah, did I mention the violence? Not sure how that aspect holds up today. But for 1990, the bloodshed and body count, things Verhoeven have never been shy about depicting, stood out to the point that Total Recall was originally given an X rating. It took slight trims and alternate angles of some of the more outrageous deaths to get that R rating. All and all, a fun film that luxuriates in its excesses. Let's do this, shall we?



BOOGIE NIGHTS introduced by Lisa Kereszi- Fri Aug 10 at 9:30 for a 7 dollar bar minimum.- Rubin Museum of Art- A special screening of Boogie Nights at the Rubin Museum, for only a 7 dollar minimum (2 Cokes or 1 beer will do the trick). Part of a series of films where a woman on screen works a camera, introduced New York photographers who just happen to be female. For this film, photographer Lisa Kereszi will introduce the screening. Now Boogie Nights qualifying for this series based on Heather Graham briefly wielding a Polaroid is flimsy. But an excuse to screen one of the best films of 1997 on a non-Midnight time slot is good for all of us.

Yeah, it's easy to describe Paul Thomas Anderson's art-house hit as a journey from the fun loving era of 1970s porn on film, to the more streamlined 1980s era of porn on videotape, with more than a little loss of innocence. Even if their non-sexual intercourse skills would have gotten them laughed out of community theater, there's an earnest in the 1970s scenes, that would take a major beating once the 80s come along. But this follows more along the lines of a family you create can mean more than the family you're born into path.This group of porn stars, director, and staff is generally not accepted within their biological families. But to paraphrase the tagline from The Big Chill, in a cold world, you need your friends to keep you warm.  

With a cast that is an embarrassment of riches, boy did Anderson do well for himself in this category. From the actors who were known as leads (Mark Wahlberg, Burt Reynolds, Julianne Moore), actors would become leads after Boogie Nights (Don Cheadle, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Thomas Jane), character actors (Luis Guzman, Alfred Molina, Philip Baker Hall, Ricky Jay, Joss Whedon/ Cabin in the Woods fave Tom Lenk), and actors who were working before and after this picture (William H. Macy, John C. Reily, and Graham who at 90 might only be thought of as Roller Girl) Oscar nominations for Anderson for his Screenplay, Moore for Supporting Actress, and Reynolds for Supporting Actor. Supposedly at the time, this wasn't considered a great deal for Burt, being cast in both Bean and this; a film about 70s porn from a director with only an art house flop (the decent Hard Eight) on the resume. He fired his agent shortly before or after filming, don't remember which. After supposedly receiving a big big check from a share of Bean's rather large grosses, and receiving his Oscar nomination for Boogie Nights, it was believed Burt's career was officially revived. After films such as The Crew, Mystery Alaska and Universal Soldier 2 and 3, that idea was put to rest real fast. Not that it should put you off from seeing this, it is his best screen performance after all:



ALL ABOUT EVE for free at Bryant Park- Mon Aug 13 at Sunset- All About Eve, one of the few films to be on both AFI Top 100 lists, and in my own personal top 35 (not that one has to do with the other), gets a free screening at Bryant Park. Screening starts at sundown, but for a film that's not only filled with great dialogue but is more reliant on that than on its visuals, try to position yourself near a speaker as well as for a decent view of the screen. 

The acclaimed bitch fest starring Bette Davis that beat Sunset Blvd. for Best Picture. A life in the theater (soft of) kind of film with terrific performances and some of the bitchiest dialogue known to man. I mean, my God, more acid drips out of say, Bette Davis's and George Sanders's tongue, then from the creatures in Aliens. 14 Oscar nominations, 6 Oscars, including for Picture, Director Joseph L. Mankiewicz, Sanders for Supporting Actor and for the Screenplay. Most nominations in Oscar history, Titanic could only tie it:

http://www.bryantpark.org/plan-your-visit/filmfestival.html


Let me know if there's interest. Later all.

Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Late July revivals







Hey, Mike here with the rest of the interesting revival options for the month of June. A minor cheat with the inclusion of one film on August 1st, but with the choice I made, I'm sure you won't complain. Before I go on with the current list, a special thanks to those who came out to the recent Hello, Dolly! screening on Sunday July 22nd at the Walter Reade. Thanks for pushing for Hello Dolly for a birthday gathering, and letting me be a part of the outing despite my major reservations about the film and pushing aside my alternative option of The Red Shoes, good move. While I wouldn't use this film as a person's gateway into movie musicals, this works so much better on the big screen than on TV. The pacing doesn't feel off until we got to the second half of the film with too many dancing waiters sequences (get on with the story). And you never buy Walter Matthau and Barbara Streisand as a potential couple though you buy their performances individually, and you buy Tommy Tune only as a dancer, a hell of a dancer, but not as an actor.

But you buy everything else. The Yonkers section is great, all the songs work, I tolerated Michael Crawford far better than I thought I would, Ernest Lehman's screenplay improves upon the stage book, the amount of long takes used for the musical numbers were impressive, and the 70mm restoration just popped in ways that it's impossible to comprehend without seeing for yourself. An MGM-esque musical that came at the unfair time when audiences were moving away from most forms of "old school" filmmaking. Good film and good day overall. Now on with the list:

  

INHERIT THE WIND- Thurs July 26 at 6- Walter Reade at Lincoln Center- Part of the Gene Kelly retrospective. The best adaptation, including the 3 TV versions, of the classic Jerome Lawrence/ Robert E. Lee play. A somewhat to more-than-somewhat dramatized account of the Scopes Monkey trial that feels quaint at times. Not in terms of timeliness; sorry to say the film feels as relevant as ever. And not in terms of filmmaking or performances, but in terms on how the sides view each with a form of respect. Yes, there is a mob depicted but the rest of the time, between Drummond (Spencer Tracy) and Brady (Fredric March), there's are signs and feelings of mutual respect between men of sharply opposing views that seems missing for a long time now.

The big draw here is the acting, especially the scenes between Tracy and March. You can tell this film was drawing the best from its actors leads as well as from the supporting players (Harry Morgan, Claude Atkins and Dick York among them). I feel this adaptation is better than the 3 TV adaptation, and even an improvement over the play. Minor changes and additions done on the transfer from stage to screen, most involving Kelly's role as the reporter. All improvements as far as I'm concerned, though you can't always tell, based on Kelly's merely ok performance. 4 Oscar nominations, including Tracy for Actor and for Screenplay Adaptation. Sorry I couldn't post more films from the Kelly retrospective, but instead of ending it like the Walter Reade will with Xanadu, but it end on a high note with Inherit The Wind:



HEROES SHED NO TEARS and HARD BOILED- Fri July 27 at 7:30 (Heroes) and 9:20 (Hard)- 92ndY Tribeca- 200 Hudson St.- For one admission, a John Woo double feature. The first film, I don't know. The second, one of my all time fun favorite action films. First, Heroes Shed No Tears, shot in 1984, but shelved until the success of A Better Tomorrow. Members of the Thai government hire an elite Chinese group of mercenaries to capture a powerful drug lord. Those who survive succeed in capturing the drug lord. But things get difficult once they try to bring him back through some jungle terrain. On the one hand, the surviving henchmen are on their trail. And on the other hand, they all must deal with a powerful Vietnamese colonel who wants revenge on the mercenaries' leader. And, oh yeah, there are also the natives of the jungle, with their own weapons. This was John Woo's first gun fight film, and the bullets, knives and explosives, boy do they fly and go off over the 90 or so minutes. Or so I hear. I don't know the film, but I am curious.

Now if you're an American of a certain age who enjoy action films, you were introduced to John Woo before his American films, the darn good Face Off and the mediocre Hard Target, were released. You were probably introduced to one of two films either via cable or bootleg VHS. The film you were introduced to is probably one of your favorite action films. It could have been The Killer for you, but for me it was Hard Boiled from 1992. Chow Yun-Fat secured his status as action hero extraordinaire, as a Dirty Harry-like cop, trying to avenge the death of his partner, while investigating gun runners who are fighting over territory. Tony Leung (The Lover, Infernal Affairs) plays a hit man with a secret, who sides against the more violent gun runner. Both men collide, when said gun runner and his mob hold a hospital full of people hostage. This mob has superior fire power that keeps the police helpless, and the cop and the hitman with a secret can only rely on each to take out the gang. One floor at a time, one room at a time.

The film is pretty good before you get to the hospital. Yun-Fat and Leung are charismatic, the gun fights are stylized and interestingly shot. But the last hour takes place in the hospital, and that's when Woo ratchets everything up another level. The firefights are incredibly complicated at the start and increase in complications as it goes on. The mix of quick edits and single shot extended action scenes have to be seen to be believed. And oh yeah, there's a little humor in there too. No one will ever confuse John Woo with say, Woody or Mel Brooks or even Judd Apatow. But Woo sneaks it in throughout, and is a pleasant surprise during the second half. Overall, I can sit through Heroes Shed No Tears, if it means I get to enjoy Hard Boiled in all its glory:
  


PIXOTE for free, subject to ticket availability- Fri July 27 at 8- MOMA- 11 West 53rd Street- A free screening, subject to availability. A brutal, dark film from director Hector Babenco (Kiss of the Spider Woman) back in 1981. Consider this as kind of like Larry Clark's Kids; similar style of realistic filmmaking. It depicted a sub-world in Brazil, where abandoned or orphaned poor kids formed their own circles, staying out of school and going into either prostitution or crime in general. Played in a lot of cases by kids playing a variation of themselves. For them, it seemed like there were only two ways out: jail or death, and most of them didn't have to wait for the end of the 1980s to find out which would be their fate. Bleak yet powerful. Tickets for the 8pm screening become available on a first come first served basis at 4pm that afternoon:



CHARLEY VARRICK- Sat July 28 at 7:45- Film Forum- - 209 West Houston St.- Part of the Forum's 100th anniversary of Universal Pictures retro. I really want to make a push to see this, but first, a little story. At a recent birthday brunch before a revival screening of Hello Dolly (pretty darn good by the way), one of the leads, Walter Matthau, was brought up. Specifically how every role he played was crotchety and/or grumpy. Now had I been more awake (seriously I still needed caffeine at that point in the brunch), I would have brought up his performance in this film. Maybe A Face in the Crowd as well, but definitely Charley Varrick.

From director Don Siegel. This was his follow-up to Dirty Harry. It's probably his best film that's been seen by the fewest people. Walter Matthau in the title role plays a small time bank robber who leads his gang in stealing from small banks. Smaller payoffs mean less security to deal with and less scrutiny from the law. But the gang accidentally knocks over a bank that launders Mafia money. Now he has the law and the mob after him, and must use all his smarts to try to get out alive. Everyone is treated as a recognizable human being, including Matthau's crazy partner (Andrew Robinson, the killer in Dirty Harry), John Vernon's charismatic mob boss, even Joe Don Baker's genteel, psycho mob enforcer. Ok, the stuff involving Matthau and Felicia Farr (the wife of Matthau's friend, Jack Lemmon) has aged badly, but that's the only major quibble. Even the planning, time, and detail that goes into the Mob's efforts to clean up the various messes left by the robbery, the efforts of the law to catch up with Varrick, and Varrick's own efforts to get himself out of this mess is realistic for a movie. And all of it pays off.

A major flop in the U.S. despite very good reviews, but a big hit in Europe. It's never been released on VHS, Universal cares so little about the film the DVD isn't even in Widescreen, and this has only enjoyed the rare screening on AMC and TCM. For fans of caper films and/or modern film noir, here's a treat you probably never heard of. Let's do this one. “The narrative line is clean and direct, the characterizations economical and functional and the triumph of intelligence gloriously satisfying.” – Andrew Sarris.


THE WOLF MAN (1941) and THE MUMMY (1932)- Mon July 29 at 9 (Wolf Man) and 10:25 (Mummy)- Film Forum- Part of the Forum's 100th anniversary of Universal Studios retrospective. Horror films were what made Universal its initial big bucks. Now here is a double feature of two seventy minute or so horror films that rely more on atmosphere, quality black and white cinematography, and more than a little pathos then some blood and guts. Now don't get me wrong, if I hated bloody gross out effects in horror films, I would never have posted the John Carpenter version of The Thing. But let's have a little variety in our film choices, people.

Start things off with the original talking version of The Wolf Man. Lon Chaney Jr.'s best known role, as tragic Larry Talbot returns home and is bitten by gypsy werewolf Bela Lugosi. He tries to deal with this, but ends up confronted at moon rise by father Claude Raines and the other townspeople hunting him, including Ralph Bellamy. The effects obviously don't stack up when compared to say, An American Werewolf in London. But does it look great? Yes. Do you end up feeling sorry for our lead and all else involved, except for Lugosi? Yes. Is the storytelling still effective? Yes.

The same can be said for the original talking film version of The Mummy. Some archaeology in Egypt leads to the resurrection of title character Boris Karloff. He discovers that one of the members of expedition is the reincarnation of his great love, and will do anything to make her his again, which includes turning her into a living mummy like himself. And if she, her boyfriend, and everyone else in the expedition party doesn't like it, too bad.

Much credit for the film's success needs to go director Karl Freund. A cinematographer for most of his life, he shot Metropolis and did uncredited work in making the Bela Lugosi version Dracula what it is, including creating the famous shot of the hypnotism stare of Lugosi.  The shot selection and mood lighting does much to create the quality of the film. The effective story does the rest. Overall, a nice quick double feature for a potentially hot summer night:   



THE 400 BLOWS with a short- Wed Aug 1 at 8- MOMA- Part of MOMA's series of depictions of youth on film. Francois Truffaut's classic 1959 film; his first feature-length picture, and one of those first credited for launching New Wave cinema successfully. Semi-autobiographical we follow Truffaut's most famous character, neglected Antoine Doinel, during his time as petty criminal and in reform school. We learn to sympathize with him, while noting every fault and every mistake that does more damage to his life than it should. Francois's mother was NOT happy with the final result/implications. Of course this includes the classic final 2 minutes, and one of the most memorable final freeze shots in movie history, no hyperbole on my part. Oscar nominated for Original Screenplay. But not for Foreign Film, Black Orpheus was chosen to be France's representative. It won the category, but it's borderline unwatchable as far as I'm concerned. Wait, what was I saying? Just see this please.

Preceding The 400 Blows, is a short from 1911: Public School Exercises and Recreation. An 11 minute film from the Edison Company, depicting the day in the life of students at P.S. 41 in the Bronx: