Wednesday, October 19, 2011

October revivals: second half











Hey, Mike here with a revival list for the rest of October. Not a lot in terms of horror except for Halloween weekend, but some pretty darn good ones overall. Here we go:



WEEKEND- Wed Oct 19 and Thurs Oct 20 at 5:30, 7:40 and 10- Film Forum- A new 35mm print of Goddard's black comedy. 2 more nights to try to catch this. When I wrote about Weekend last time, I didn't get the sense of how big this was back in the day, in Goddard's career, and in the hearts and minds of film critics and historians. Since then, after reading much New York based writing about Weekend, I get the sense of where it was in Goddard's career and how he wouldn't make a film quite like this ever again, and that this is a very big deal among most film critics. Not so sure if it was that big a deal to American audiences beyond whatever the art house scene comprised of back in the late 60s. I also have an even stronger sense that Weekend will either be very good or pretentious junk that's aged badly, nothing in-between. I'm willing to take a chance if you are:



CITIZEN KANE with or without JANE ERYE (1943)- Fri Oct 21 at 5:05 (Kane), 7:15 (Jane) and 9:05 (Kane)- Film Forum- The start of the Forum's Bernard Herrmann retrospective. One of the giants of film composers, the retrospective begins with 2 Orson Welles films he scored.

First, Citizen Kane. Ok people, show of hands, how many of you have ever heard of Citizen Kane? Ok, good. If you even bother to look at this list at all, you at least know of Orson Welles' film. Didn't expect to see any hands from those under 18 anyway. Now, how many of you know more about Kane than just Rosebud, even if it's aided by memories of HBO's passable version of the making of Kane, RKO 281? Similar number of hands, fine.

Seeing this on the big screen as opposed to watching it on TV, there's a world of difference. In terms of storytelling, pacing and emotional depth (as well as innovative in its use of visual effects, make-up and music), as modern a film as what we have now in release, and a lot better than all but a hand full (I'm trying to be nice and not be considered a snob. I probably failed at that a long time ago). Now, how many of you have actually seen Citizen Kane from beginning to end? Ok, the number of hands have dropped, but I'll let you decide if that would be a fairly low number. I mean, some of have seen it through the very occasional airings on TCM. Maybe 1 or 2 of have seen it/ own it on DVD. New York/ New Jersey people as recent as the early 80s saw this on one of Channel 9's Million Dollar Movie airings. Or maybe 1 or 2 of you saw it in a film class or some sort. Now, how many of you have actually seen this on the big screen? Yeah, that's what I thought. The 1 or 2 of you who saw this with me at the Forum, when Kane ran for a week back in March 2004, or the one who saw it with me at the Forum last April.

A flop in its day (when you do a thinly veiled attack on William Randolph Hearst, and he still wields considerable influence, it's amazing no one burned the negatives behind RKO's backs), a classic today. First, in France, where it was screened shortly after WW 2, and had the praise and backing of filmmakers like Goddard. Then in the mid to late 50s, when it aired on TV and had a major re-release. 9 Oscar nominations, including Picture, Welles for Actor and Director, Herrmann for his Score, and Editing for Robert Wise. An Oscar to Welles and Joseph J. Mankiewicz for the Screenplay. Number one on both AFI Top 100 lists, and along with Casablanca and The Godfather, always in the conversation for greatest American films ever made. That it's in my personal top 6 should be a little obvious.

Next, Jane Eyre. The first English language sound version of Charlotte Bronte's classic story, from 1943. Jane goes through a harsh childhood, grows up to be Joan Fontaine, and is hired by Welles' rash, reckless Edward Rochester, to tutor/care for his daughter. There's something that grows between them, but oh do we have some harsh times to come. With child actress Margaret O'Brien as Adele, Agnes Moorehead as mean Mrs. Reed, and an uncredited, 10 year old Elizabeth Taylor in an early role. Have only seen clips of this version, don't have to stay for it. But since we're already paying one admission for this double feature, why not?



COLOSSUS: THE FORBIN PROJECT with post film talk- Sat Oct 22 at 6 (Forbin)- 92nd St Y Tribeca- 200 Hudson St.-The only film, released in 1970, in 92nd Y Tribeca's series of Doomsday films that I have both possible time and definite interest in. Years before the creation of Skynet and WOPR/Joshua, and a few years at most before the creation of the HAL-9000, there was Colossus. A super defense computer built to protect the U.S. from the Soviets. Protected by being built inside a mountain, and powered by its own nuclear plant. But after they link together, Colossus and its Soviet counterpart become of one mind. And they decide to expand, force the American creator Dr. Forbin to help it. And with that, Colossus will seek to help humanity, to protect and improve it. And if humanity doesn't agree, there's always the Nuclear option . . .

Taut, literate film. The technology may not have aged well, but if you can accept the concept of Skynet, you can accept Colossus. And if you can accept that the human protagonists are trying to combat Colossus with logic and reasoning as opposed to machine guns and grenade launchers, then you'll like this film. Grounded lead by Eric Braden (best known for either Titanic or The Young and the Restless), as Forbin, who plots against his dream project. After the mid 80s, this film seemed to disappear, except for a DVD dump released back in 2004. So you probably don't know it, and now is a good time to catch up with it.

After the screening, there will be a discussion about subjects brought up in the film, like robotics and AI. According to the website, the featured panelists are reporter Maggie Jackson, Time Out NY critic Joshua Rothkopf, roboticist Chris Bregler and AI pioneer Roger Schank. The moderator is Motherboard editor Michael Byrne:

http://www.92y.org/Tribeca/Event/Colussus--The-Forbin-Project.aspx


NORTH BY NORTHWEST- Sun Oct 23 at 6 and 8:30 and Mon Oct 24 at 9:30- Film Forum- Part of the Bernard Herrmann retro. The best of all the lightweight Alfred Hitchcock films. No big morals here. Just sit back and relax, as everyman Cary Grant gets confused as a secret agent by sinister forces led by James Mason. He runs from them and runs from the law, for a murder at the United Nations he didn't commit. Of course all this running around doesn't stop Grant from taking time to flirt with mysterious Eva Marie Saint, in some of the most fun innuendo that the remnants of the Production Code would allow.

I use the term everyman loosely when describing Grant. But according to Gene Wilder on his episode of Inside The Actors Studio, that's how Grant described himself during a chance meeting on a cruise ship, where the Northwest homage Silver Streak, was playing. Wilder was pleasantly stunned to here this description, as well as how Grant was nice enough to include Wilder as being on the same level, but I digress.

Fun film, with good performances, a snappy though unsubtle Herrmann score, with one of Saul Bass's best opening credit sequences. Oscar nominations for the great Editing, Art Direction, and Ernest Lehman's script. Have never seen this on the big screen. I missed my chance about 6 years back, when it was screened for several weekends at midnight at the Paris theater. I'm sorry I missed catching it on the Paris's large screen, but I blame a girl named Amanda for that. The Forum's screen will be adequate for the occasion, their sound system should rock the hell out of Herrmann's score, so to speak:



DESPERATELY SEEKING SUSAN- introduced by robbinschilds- Mon Oct 24 at 7- IFC Center- A sleeper hit from the spring of 1985. A variation of Alice In Wonderland, as a bored housewife spots a regular personal ad in the paper titled 'Desperately Seeking Susan'. She heads off to New York, following the ad, and finds Susan. From there, it gets a little trippy, as said housewife loses herself, and yet finds herself, in this new trippy world. A time capsule of the Village of the mid 1980s, and a fun, at times romantic, comedy. Made Rosanna Arquette a working actress for a while, but it deserves to be considered the Madonna movie, since she overshadows better actors (Adian Quinn, Laurie Metcalf, John Turturro), with a solid, appealing persona.

This is part of IFC Center's Queer/Art Film series. Choreographers Sonya Robbins and Layla Childs, also known as robbinschilds, will introduce the film, and discuss how the film influenced them and their art:



CAPE FEAR (1962) and TAXI DRIVER- Fri Oct 28 at 3:05 (Cape), 5:05 (Taxi), 7:10 (Cape), 9:10 (Taxi)- Film Forum- Another double feature in the Bernard Herrmann retrospective. Now I brought up Taxi Driver earlier in the year, and caught a new digital print (so to speak) back in March. I saw that, as opposed to the new 35mm restored print the Forum had at the same time. Now that print is back. I don't have to see it. But since it's in my personal top 100 I certainly wouldn't mind, considering what it's playing with: the somewhat rarely screened Cape Fear. Specifically, the original from 1962. You might unfairly label this as Atticus Finch vs Mitchum, but let's not go there because we 're talking about even more of a psychological battle in this version than the Martin Scorsese remake.

Robert Mitchum spends years in jail, based on testimony from lawyer Gregory Peck. Now Mitchum's out of jail, and he engages in full psychological warfare, stalking Peck and his family. May not have the great scene like there was between De Niro and Juliette Lewis in the remake, though the sexual tension between villain and teenager comes from the remake, not here. Just a series of good scenes and ratcheting tension, lead to a better climax on the boathouse than in the remake. With Polly Bergen as Peck's wife, Martin Balsam as the police chief, and Telly Savalas as a private detective. If one wanted to just catch Cape Fear and skip Taxi Driver, I understand. But i wouldn't mind staying for both.


LITTLE SHOP OF HORRORS with either ALIEN or FRANKENSTEIN introduced by Sara Karloff- Sun Oct 30 at 1 (Horrors), 4 (Alien) and 7 (Frankenstein)- Museum of the Moving Image in Astoria- Up to 3 films can be seen on this day at the Moving Image in Astoria. Seeing 2 of these films would make checking out the Jim Henson exhibit difficult. But all of these films are good, the last two are great, and all are appropriate for Halloween. First, Little Shop of Horrors, musical version, from the Henson retrospective. Why? Because this was not only frequent Henson collaborator Frank Oz's first solo directorial effort, but all the Audrey 2 puppets were made from the Henson workshop.

Might be the best musical of the 1980s, but when your only competition in that decade is The Little Mermaid, The Blues Brothers, Pennies From Heaven, A Chorus Line, Breakin, and Breakin 2: Electric Bugaloo, and you'll have to excuse me if I'm not impressed. Let me not be a hater here. It's a wonderful upgrade of the Roger Corman original, where nebbish Seymour tries to get his dream girl Audrey to pay, eh, close attention to him. But he makes the flower shop with the popularity of the alien plant named Audrey 2, who has an appetite for blood, and grows far beyond its original plant pot. Director Frank Oz's best film.

Rick Moranis doesn't have the best singing voice but beyond that, he's the perfect Seymour. Ellen Greene (Pushing Daises) does sing well, and successfully transferred her stage performance to screen. Vincent Gardenia makes an appropriate Mr. Mushnik. But back in 86, to draw audiences who tended to avoid movie musicals, a lot of Warner Bros.' advertising push was to promote the cameos/extended cameos of comics associated with SNL or SCTV. Yes, Christopher Guest, John Candy and James Belushi are there. But the ones who pack the film with energy and elevate the material are Steve Martin (as the abusive dentist; his Be A Dentist" is a standout) and Bill Murray (who steals the film as the depraved dental patient; not an improvement of Jack Nicholson's original take, so much as a hysterical variation). Personally, I feel a chunk of the film's high energy departs when Murray and Martin leave the screen for good, even with Levi Stubbs' inspired vocals as Audrey 2. But the film is a pleasant enough ride, even with an ending that was changed to please preview audiences who hated the original end. Oscar noms for Visual Effects, and to Howard Ashman and Alan Menken for Best Song (Mean Green Mother from Outer Space).

Next, Alien. Part of the Museum's series of films that must be seen on the big screen. I'll buy that. I believe it's a print of the original 1979 release, as opposed to the "director's cut" from about 8 years ago. My guess the website doesn't indicate otherwise. It means we don't get more establishment shots of the soon-to-be claustrophobic ship interiors, more signs of dislike and/or disrespect of Ripley, and the final fates of a few characters. All worked when restored to the film, but not essential to the film's enjoyment. Especially the extra interiors. I've seen this with several of you before, but that doesn't stop me from posting this again. This film works, better than anything Ridley Scott as ever done. Excellent combo of look, pace and sound. In my personal top 100. C'mon, it's fun.

Last, Frankenstein from director James Whale, often remade, but never topped. Mostly serious, as opposed to almost all the sequels, with iconic scenes and the popular image/performance of Boris Karloff as the misunderstood creation. Originally on the AFI top 100, and still a classic American film. I saw it last year at the Forum and wouldn't mind catching it again. Not sure if it quite works as horror at this point. But aside from the film's corny coda (shot by the studio over Whale's objection), Frankenstein still works as a drama. By the time the monster is trapped by the people in the windmill, your heart still goes out to the monster despite that has occurred leading up to this scene. Karloff's daughter, Sara, will introduce the screening.

Don't forget, the Jim Henson exhibit is still going on and I recommend it. I still say you need at least 2 hours to go through it properly. The films this day may or may not allow it. Let me go through the possibilities with. The only you can do 2 hours worth of Henson and see all three films is to get there by 10:30AM: this leaves you with time for coffee in between the films and a quick bite in between Alien and Frankenstein. You'd have plenty of time to for the Henson exhibit if you skip say Little Shop or Alien, but not a lot of time if you catch the first two films but skip Frankenstein, though at least you'd eat dinner at a normal time. Let me know what you might want to do, especially if someone wants to skip Frankenstein in favor of the next film below the 3 moving image links:





RE-ANIMATOR introduced by director Stuart Gordon and actor Jeffery Combs- Sun Oct 30 at 9:30- Walter Reade at Lincoln Center- The only film in Lincoln Center's series of Scary Movies that I might have time for. Not a very faithful adaptation of H.P. Lovecraft's story, as a darkly comedic take on Frankenstein, with the blood, violence and nudity amped up to almost cartoonish levels. Young medical student is in love with the hot blonde daughter (Barbara Crampton, sigh) of the dean of the medical school. The aforementioned hot blonde daughter is in turn, eyed like a piece of meat by an older, slimy rival doctor. Everything comes to a head with a arrival of Dr. Herbert West (Jeffery Combs, the go-to character actor on most of the Star Trek series-es). The mad Dr. West has come up with a serum that brings the dead back to life. But since it's still in the experimental phase, and Dr. West doesn't do a good job in containing his "living" experiments, the consequences on all the characters will be brutal.

Re-Animator will be screened in its original unrated cut, the version I first saw on VHS back in the day. Jaw dropping and audacious. If you told me back then that this would screen at Lincoln Center 2 decades later, my responses would be: "They show films in Lincoln Center?" and "You've got to be KIDDING me?!?!?!". Nice to know I can be wrong in a good way. If you're not a fan of horror films, you're not likely to embrace this. Yes it's bloody and violent, but the over the top style allows the gore to go down better. If you haven't seen it recently, it'll still make you jump, it'll still make you laugh, and will make you very uncomfortable. Though not as uncomfortable Barbara Crampton may have felt when shooting this. I'm still surprised how much Crampton allowed(?)/endured in her infamous scene, when the lecherous older doc has his way. Actor Combs (as the insane yet still appealing scientist) and director/co-writer Stuart Gordon will introduce this screening:



PSYCHO (1960) and OBSESSION- Mon Oct 31 at 4:50 (Psycho), 6:50 (Obsession), 8:40 (Psycho)- Film Forum- A double feature of Bernard Herrmann scored films, semi-appropriate for Halloween. 2 horror films technically, the later less so. But both have major psychological issues on display.

First, Psycho. Honestly, I'm not trying to make a habit of posting this film each and every time it comes up. It's that I haven't seen it each time I've posted, and I'm gonna try again when it's playing at a convenient time for me. Which it is here.

Familiar to many, but I'm telling you, it's a completely different beast on the big screen as opposed to TV. You're not spending time in your living room, check marking all the familiar aspects of the story. This story sucks you in, lulls you into thinking one way, and then turns it around. You know all this, you wouldn't be looking at this list if you've never heard of Psycho. But this tightly edited story draws you despite what you know. And if you've somehow NEVER seen it, oh boy I'd like to see this with you.

And despite being an unplanned landmark in the horror genre, slasher sub-section, I would argue that this plays more like a suspense thriller then a horror pic. So those that have problems with horror flicks, should be ok with this. Interesting to watch acting-wise, as well. John Gavin's boyfriend performance hasn't aged too well, and Vera Miles's isn't bad, but definitely more then a little annoying. Not as shrill as Julianne Moore's in the remake, but still. Martin Balsam continued his reliable character actor work here, as a more believable ex-cop then Bill Macy in the remake.
There is a reason why this is Janet Leigh's most memorable performance, and it's not because of the shower scene. Go ahead, name another memorable performance of hers. Oops, Touch of Evil, not quite. Being part of the memorable opening scene doesn't qualify as a performance. And Manchurian Candidate doesn't count either. Being the red herring of a story's plot, eh, whatever. Despite Hitchcock's feeling about actor being cattle, Leigh gets to play a truly conflicted person. Decent, wanting more out of life, caught up in temptation, then over her head looking for a way out, which is about when she pulls into the Bates Motel.

But Anthony Perkins' performance feels modern today. Creepy, alive, desperate to open up, yet jittery within his own skin, and with just a little anger threatening to bubble up. Ole' Hitch may not have understood what Perkins was bringing to the table, but Alfred was patient enough to give him free rein. Thanks to the success of this, Tony could never be free of the typecasting. Oscar nominations for Leigh (her only one), Hitch for Director (his last nomination), Cinematography and Art Direction. On both AFI Top 100 lists and in my personal top 100. Catch this.

Next is Obsession, a forgotten Brian de Palma film from 1976. Not so much of a "good, it's forgotten" like Wise Guys, but a film that should be re-discovered. Cliff Robertson plays a rich businessman, who's never recovered from the kidnapping/death of both his wife and daughter. Years after the incident, he meets a young woman (Genevieve Bujold, one of my favorites) who's the spitting image of his late wife. What happens next, well if you don't know exactly, I won't give much in terms of spoiler. I will say it's a bit reminiscent of Hitchcock's Rebecca, and more than a little similar to Vertigo. Released in that in-between time, after Vertigo had been out of circulation for years, but before Vertigo was re-released and attained near instant classic status. Not saying this to denigrate Obsession. Just pointing out what its similar to without jumping into major spoilers with the psychological issues on screen. With John Lithgow as Robertson's friend. Featuring a romantic Herrmann score, for which he received a posthumous Oscar nomination (alongside his score for Taxi Driver, both losing to The Omen).



Let me know if there's interest. Later all.

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

The Thing (2011)

Will try to keep it brief. While the newest version probably won't reach the same kind of classic status that the Howard Hawks original and the John Carpenter remake attained, it merits attention for your Halloween dollar. Was worried about saying this was a prequel to the Carpenter version, thinking that it would be a nice surprise for the uninitiated. But since the studio seems to be pushing the prequel notion front and center in interviews, you might as well know it too. Keeps a couple of main elements from the Hawks version: team discovers spaceship and alien on ice, creature thaws out, havoc reigns while the lead scientist tries to maintain control beyond reason. Aside from one shot in the first half, all homages to Carpenter's take seem to be confined to the second half. Good idea to keep the film in 1982. It limits the technology the humans can use to fight the creature, as well as show how closed off they are from the outside world.

Best addition here is how our main hero is different then the rest of the team, and why the rest of the (mostly Norwegian) team are distrustful. 'She's young, not as experienced as us. On top of that, she's a she who doesn't know her place AND she's an American to boot!' Mary Elizabeth Winstead is the lead whose never less than interesting, and at times, quietly good. The updated CGI technology allows the filmmakers to credibly expand the creatures' capabilities. Not always to the near perfection of the original man-made effects from the Carpenter film. But the first time we get a full look at one of these creatures, as well as a melding sequence used to connect this and the Carpenter film, stand out among the more daring designs that have been successfully pulled off. This version also has a lack of humor, dark or otherwise. But the tension remains credible throughout, and this version of The Thing is worth catching.

Thursday, September 29, 2011

October revivals: first half











Hey all, Mike here with a revival list for October's first half. But first, let me address what I see as possible upcoming revivals that I may or may not post over the next few months. First, Ghostbusters, which will be re-released in about 500 AMC theaters in the U.S for one screening only on 3 Thursday nights in October. I'll let you look it up on your own, because I won't post them. I saw it as a Midnight screening around 2004 or 2005. I like it, fun not-so-little New York movie, which gave me pleasant throwback memories to childhood. But the visual effects don't hold up, it feels longer than it felt back then, and though there are quite a few good supporting performances, the film is held together by Bill Murray. A believable X factor whose unpredictability, even if you know the film by heart, keeps you interested and laughing. Hard to believe what this could have looked like if John Belushi lived to tackle the role. Anyway, Ghostbusters is a 3 out of 4 star, 7 out of 10, thumbs up for me. But if I ever thought to put together a top 10 of 1984 list and this is on it, it must because there's a steep drop for me in quality after A Solider's Story, Amadeus, This Is Spinal Tap, The Killing Fields and Greystoke. It's similar release pattern done earlier this year by Taxi Driver and Top Gun. But the former is in my personal top 100 and the later is cheesy fun, and Ghostbusters is right in the middle. Not enough to post however.

Next, the Museum of the Moving Image will start of a retrospective of films under the title See It Big! Basically, in the age of being able to see films on newer, smaller viewing platforms, some films just won't play as well there. So with the ability to show screen films as large as 70mm or in digital 3-D, the Museum will screen films best viewed on a large screen. This excited me, until I saw that most of films in the retrospective are revivals I saw pre-blog list format (Lawrence of Arabia, Close Encounters), blog list format (Gone With the Wind), or both (Fantasia, Alien, The Shining), plus Avatar. I've taken a little heat for repeat listing of certain films, especially those I've seen on the big screen more then twice. If I didn't like the film at all, I wouldn't post them at all. But I promise if I post any films I caught and dragged others to see, it will be tied in to see some other film or special playing there, probably something from the Jim Henson retrospective. Point is, for most of these films, to combine them with both the Henson retrospective and the Henson exhibit for one price, is well worth it. Now on with the current list, here we go:



THE LION KING in 3-D- Now until at least Thurs October 6- Different theaters with their own times, check your newspapers or websites for your own areas- The Lion King has been so popular in its 3-D re-release, that its been extended for another week. This has been credited for not only making flops out of films such as Drive and whatever that thing Sarah Jessica Parker is starring in, but its making studios consider the idea of re-releasing films (a successful business idea that became rare after 1991). And as for the idea of "Why should we see it, we have a 3-D version of Lion King, its called BROADWAY", piss off. There are 40 plus other states without a stage version of Lion King, and they have spoken. God, no wonder a lot of people seem to hate New York City/ Long Island . . . sorry, I digress . . .

Anyway, this re-release should play at least through Thursday, October 6. But considering the blu-ray disc comes out on Tuesday October 4th, I wouldn't wait too long.


BEN-HUR (1959)- Sat Oct 1 at 10:30am, introduced by William Wyler's daughter Catherine, and Charlton Heston's son Frasor- Alice Tully Hall- 185 W. 65th st, 4th floor- The 11 time Oscar winner and one of the highest grossing films ever mad (don't look at the regular list; check the adjusted for inflation list and be surprised), Ben-Hur gets a special screening. In time for its Blu-Ray release this week, the Charlton Heston-William Wyler classic gets a digital screening. An upgraded 8K Digital screening in its original 2.76 Aspect Ratio. Miklos Roza's score, among the best ever for a film, will heard in 6.0 Dolby Stereo.

I went a long time without seeing Ben-Hur. It played frequently on the 4:30 Movie here in NYC. But it was chopped into what, 4 or 5 parts maybe, and if I was ever going to watch a Heston film back then, it would be Planet of the Apes. Once cable came along in the household, I still wouldn't pay much attention to it. The only time would be sequences of the famous chariot scene in a documentary about Wyler, or spots on TCM where the chariot scene was used as an example of the virtues or widescreen, as opposed to fullscreen or pan-and-scan.

This changed in February 2006, when I saw it on the Ziegfeld's big screen. The story of Judah Ben-Hur, a Jewish prince betrayed and sold into slavery by his Roman best friend, is the kind of epic film others aspire/aspired to be. Heston's broad style of acting results in a career performance here, as he seeks revenge throughout the year. A drive for revenge that does more to separate him from his love and his leprosy-plagued family than slavery ever did. Coming to a head with the kind of chariot race/ action scene that Gladiator and all its CGI could dream about.

Melodrama and sentiment are abound here, but I'm not opposed to a little excess, especially when its done this well. And yet the scenes involving Jesus, especially the crucifixion, were done with such sensitivity . . . . My feelings regarding The Passion of the Christ changed from being in my top Ten of 2004 just missing the top Five, to just barely in my Top 10 with no need to ever see it again. That's how good a job of direction I thought Wyler did. You might disagree, but I'm guessing you've never seen Ben-Hur on the big screen and hey, I'm not offering an answer, just a response to what I saw.

A nomination for the Screenplay. 11 Oscars, including Picture, Heston for Actor, Wyler for Director, scene-stealing Hugh Griffith for Supporting Actor, and Score. A record for Oscars, tied by Titanic and Return of the King. On both AFI Top 100 lists. May or may not be in my own top 100, but if it isn't, it's very close. Close enough that I would actually drag myself to Lincoln Center on a Saturday morning to watch. Since this is a part of the New York Film Festival, you shouldn't waste time thinking about buying to get a ticket if you're interested. Buy ahead of time. The screening will be introduced by William Wyler's daughter Catherine, and Charlton Heston's son Frasor:



THE LAST PICTURE SHOW- Sat Oct 1, Sun Oct 2, and Wed Oct 5 at 4:30, 7 and 9:30- Film Forum- A new 35mm print of the 1971 film that doesn't get a revival screening too often. Two milieu are depicted here. Life in high school, as its seniors are finding their way into adulthood, however slow the emotional development. All taking placing in a dying small Texas town, circa early 1950s. Our entry into this world comes from two buddies: the wild jocular type played by Jeff Bridges and the more sensitive one played by Timothy Bottoms. College doesn't seem likely for them. More likely for them, unless they choose to move to larger towns like many before them, is reflected in the lonely, frustrated bitter adults around them. Whose dreams have long since died a quiet death. All here are not depicted as country bumpkins or idiots. Maybe some are more vain, or depressed than others, but such as life.

Peter Bogdanovich jumped to A list status with this film, a status that went bye-bye, thanks to pictures like Daisy Miller and At Long Last Love. But with a great script adaptation of Larry MacMurtry's novel from Bogdanovich and MacMurtry (anyone better in depicting Texas in print than Larry?), and wonderful cinematography from Robert Surtees (black and white, per the suggestion/demand of Orson Welles), you have cinema. If it wasn't for so many good, recognizable actors in the cast, you might think you were watching a documentary, what with the almost subliminal use of music and naturalistic performances. A cast that includes Bridges, Bottoms (Tim and Sam), Cybill Shepherd (ok performance, but perfect as an object of desire), Randy Quaid, Eileen Brennan, Ellen Burstyn, Cloris Leachman, and Ben Johnson (watch his monologue by the lake, very good indeed).

Oscar nominations for Picture, Director, Screenplay Adaptation, Cinematography, Bridges for Supporting Actor and Burstyn for Supporting Actress. Oscars for Johnson for Supporting Actor and Leachman for Supporting Actress. On the second AFI Top 100 list. And with everything I said, this may be more of an acquired taste. I invite any and all to come watch this, but this might be better suited for cinephilles (or however you spell it) and those interested in quiet films. I'm not sure if this even has classic status. Two other films from 1971, The French Connection and A Clockwork Orange, may or may not have been loved by critics as much as Last Picture Show, but their classic status is unquestioned. Now I don't know which version of Last Picture Show will be screened: the 1 hour 59 minute theatrical release, or the 7 minutes longer version released in 1992. 7 minutes cut by Columbia Pictures, who insisted that the film had to have a running time under 2 hours. Whatever version is screened, I want to catch this:



SQUIRM- Thurs Oct 6 at 7:30- 92nd Y Tribeca- Part of the 92nd Y Tribeca's Ripoff Cinema. Here we have Squirm, a Southern Jaws on the ground, or the Ben-Hur of worm films, according to the 92nd Y's website. Worms get a shock of electricity down in a small Georgia town, and somehow become flesh eaters. Meanwhile, city slicker Don Scardino (best known for his off-screen work on 30 Rock) goes down to visit his girlfriend (Patricia Pearcy), and runs into some characters who not only appear to be either stereotypes or rejects from Deliverance, but also seem to have Worm Attack victim tattooed on their foreheads.

Trust me, it's more fun than I'm making it sound. Tongue is firmly planted in cheek here, when it isn't filled with rubber things passing for killer worms instead. Seriously, you can't take the threat of killer worms too seriously, and the filmmakers know this. Nobody got any acting awards for this, and once you see it, you'll know why. But I do have a fondness for our lead heroine Patricia Pearcy. Maybe she was a little too delicate looking, a little too close to say, Sissy Spacek for some casting directors tastes. Aside from the soap Ryan's Hope and a small role in The Goodbye Girl, she didn't seem to get much of a chance for substantial screen roles, except for this fun junk. She does well with it, just wish it was for something better. Nevertheless, this is fun, so if you don't mind sitting thru some cheap looking 70s fun, let's try it:



ROSEMARY'S BABY- Thurs Oct 6 at 7 and 9:30 for 7.50- Chelsea Clearview Cinema- The classic Roman Polanski horror film plays for a cheap price at a convenient location. Though more psychological at times than anything else, as well as one of those quintessential New York films. Whether it's scarier for Mia Farrow to have the Devil's baby in your womb, to marry an actor, or to have a haircut that doesn't work on your head like that pixie cut, is up to you to decide. Oscar nomination for Polanski's adaptation of Ira Levin's novel, an Oscar for Ruth Gordon as one of the witches. Can see it at either 7 with pre-film and in-film commentary by Hedda Lettuce, or at 9:30 sans commentary.

8 1/2 for a $7.00 bar admission minimum- Fri Oct 7 at 9:30- Rubin Museum of Art- Here's how you can spend a night with minimal expense. The Rubin Museum's gallery is free on Fridays, starting at 6pm. That's good for an hour, maybe more if you're really into the exhibits. You can eat out beforehand or eat from their cafe, which is right next to their bar area. The prices aren't bad at all, though the portions and/or food (lots of Himalayan and Vegetarian) may not be to your liking, so best to plan ahead. Either way the bar is there and wherever you go in that space, it's overly loud. Anyway, one beer or two ginger ales/cokes/seltzers will do the trick in terms of admission. Ask for the girl with the tickets, approach her for a film ticket. The drinks in your hands will be obvious to her. You bring yourself your ticket and your drinks down one floor sometime after 9pm, and you drink while you watch the film. You can also go back up to the bar, get another drink and bring it back to the film if you wish. I did all this with Dogtooth this summer, and liked the experience. I wouldn't mind repeating the experience with 8 1/2.

Fellini's classic film mixes reality and fantasy, as Marcello Mastroianni tries to overcome a form of director's block, while living his life in a fishbowl as a celebrity as well as trying to get his new film off the ground. The film mixes flashback, fantasy and reality, and is also a love letter to not only film in general, but the idea of a director as a kind-of Master of his little Universe. And when surrounded by classic beauties like Anouk Aimee, Claudia Cardinale and Barbara Steele, yeah man, you got it tough. Nominations for Fellini for Director and Screenplay plus Art Direction. Oscars for Best Foreign Film and the Costume Design:



WEEKEND- Sat Oct 8, Wed Oct 12, Fri Oct 15, Sat Oct 16, Wed Oct 19 and Thurs Oct 20 at 5:30, 7:40 and 10- Film Forum- A new 35mm print of Goddard's black comedy. I wasn't the biggest fan in the world of Goddard, but Breathless broke the ice. Now having seen both Every Man For Himself and Band of Outsiders over the past year, I'm ready to take on Weekend. Don't know a lot about it aside from the little I've read just so i could cough up a post. Doing my best to avoid learning many particulars so I don't spoil it for myself, though any dark comedy with a title card that says "a film adrift in the cosmos" tells me this won't be a happy trip. A married couple take her trip to the wife's sick father to secure her inheritance, by any means necessary. Their trip on the highway is chaotic, filled with road rage, sometimes brutal, with a famous tracking shot regarding a traffic jam and what's causing it. That part at least I knew about, but not the rest. Very curious to go down this dark rabbit hole and I invite you to join me:



THE GOLD RUSH- Mon Oct 10 at 2pm at Alice Tully Hall- Part of the New York Film Festival, the Charlie Chaplin classic, where the Little Tramp attempts to strike it rich during the Klondike Gold Rush, despite being unprepared for the harsh conditions. With the famous boot eating scene, including the dance with the dinner rolls. On both AFI Top 100 lists. With a restored score and live accompaniment by members of the New York Philharmonic at Alice Tully Hall. Probably the score Chaplin added to its 1942 re-release, recieving an Oscar nomination despite being an addition to a seventeen year old. If you're interested, don't waste time. Get your tickets quickly. New York Festival stuff tends to go fast you know:



CARRIE- Thurs Oct 13 at 9:30 for 7.50- Chelsea Clearview Cinema- The Brian De Palma classic where Sissy Spacek (Oscar nominated) plays the awkward girl who goes nuts, and wont be laughed at anymore. With John Travolta, Amy Irving, William Katt and Nancy Allen when they were all quite young, and Piper Laurie (also Oscar nominated) as the mother of all demented mothers. It's Brian De Palma, so we not talking subtle here. But it is among his better films. For once it's not playing at Midnight, but I rather do the screening without commentary and jokes than with.



GIORIGO MORODER'S METROPOLIS (1984)- Fri Oct 14 at Midnight- Landmark Sunshine Cinema- A midnight screening of something that's getting something of an underground resurgence. Maybe it's just curiosity, but whatever the reason, here's another chance to catch Giorigo Moroder's edit version of Fritz Lang's Metropolis. Not on DVD.
By the mid-late 80s, there was a few versions of Fritz Lang's Metropolis out there, all around 90 minutes or so, and each missing a ton of footage. In 1984, Moroder released his own cut of Metropolis. He supposedly found footage different from the other prints, but he also trimmed existing footage from his edit to make the picture run faster. 80-something minutes in length, some shots colorized or tinted, subtitles instead of title cards, and Moroder's own music running throughout. Some of it was his own score, and some of it were songs performed by acts such as Queen, Pat Benatar, Billy Squier, Adam Ant, Loverboy and Bonnie Tyler.

Some critics like this version, Siskel and Ebert in particular. But even in his thumbs up review, Gene Siskel ripped the Moroder songs, calling the lyrics "stupid". And that, was the rallying point for those who hated this version. The best that can be said is that it introduced a generation from 1984 to about 1989 (when the last laserdisc version was released) to Lang's film. In my case it took Queen's song "Radio Ga-Ga", a top 5 hit that gave Queen American success after the Flash Gordon debacle, for me to even hear of Metropolis. The video contained clips of the Moroder cut. Now, you have another chance to judge for yourself.



Let me know. Later all.